EA4BL
Member
SEM, you are an exceptional artist! Amazing work on your blog.
Congratulations. Do you scan your negs? Thank you.
Fernando.
Congratulations. Do you scan your negs? Thank you.
Fernando.
Interesting idea.
...but as much as I love my Rollei 35, how about a different second camera that compliments the Rollei?
- Maybe a digital, for color and telephoto?
- Maybe something with a 28 mm lens? For example, Nikon Lite Touch, Minolta TC-1, etc.? This would add automatic capability too, for those quick grab shots.
- Maybe a light SLR with a tele zoom? (ex. Nikon FG + Vivitar 75-205/3.8) This is bordering on heavy, compared to an R35, but adds a lot of capability.
- Half frame?
@Smaug: what is the point of uploading 12Mpx images on this forum? For pixel peepers? Typical screen can display 2Mpx, even before counting loss due to mismatch of aspect ratios.I've been shooting a lot lately with a Kiron zoom lens on my Nikon FG. Looking in my Flickr Photostream, I can spot right away the Rollei 35 shots, as they are a lot more contrasty. (due to only having a 4 element lens)
SEM, you are an exceptional artist! Amazing work on your blog.
Congratulations. Do you scan your negs? Thank you.
Fernando.
Rollei 35S. Arista 400.
This is pretty cool stunning street work
@Smaug: what is the point of uploading 12Mpx images on this forum? For pixel peepers? Typical screen can display 2Mpx, even before counting loss due to mismatch of aspect ratios.
@Smaug: what is the point of uploading 12Mpx images on this forum? For pixel peepers? Typical screen can display 2Mpx, even before counting loss due to mismatch of aspect ratios.
Generally better to post photos in a modest size, say 1200 px or less on the long side. Your uploaded photos appear at full page-width, even the verticals like your lighthouse photo. So the vertical ones then get very tall. I see the forum on a 27" monitor so large photos aren't a problem for me... But there are other members who browse the forum on much smaller screens such as phones, pads and laptops. And the larger photos may require more scrolling to see. Larger photos also slow the loading of the page. I recall this being more an issue some years ago, don't notice it so much now with a faster connection. But it may affect others...People who want to see it larger can click and view it larger.
If not, RFF crunches it to the screen size automatically. Is yours showing them full size?