True, but you should also define him as someone who used his fame, money, and adoring fans in popular culture to go on the run and never face his crime. Just as today people are saying, "can't we all just forget the past?" people were saying that 1 year after he ran from the USA. And he kept his freedom, money, and continued to make movies and do whatever the heck he wanted. It's BECAUSE of his money and fame and "talent" that he got away with his crime, so yes, those factors are important to define him too.
People can define someone however they want to. Jane Fonda is still defined by Vets for a few anti-war visits she made to N. Vietnam. Yet she's been wildly successful since. Now I see Gen Petraus is being heckled as he tries to recover from his affair, and start a new career. Being heckled as a baby killer for being the General that got us out of the Iran quagmire? Being heckled as he tries to teach his extensive command and strategic skills to our next generation? Being heckled by the same blind, mindlessly adoring fans of Polanski and Fonda. Because a Hollywood star can do no wrong. Right?