Just think,in 5 years when the shutter breaks on the x100 you could buy back the m2,that should keep going for another 40years.
What makes you think a leaf shutter is going to break in 5 years? Is it so different from the leaf shutters used in film cameras? This digital camera hate is too much here sometimes.
willie_901
Veteran
Of course you would not have to invest another penny in the M2 to use it regularly for another 40 years.
Paul T.
Veteran
Of course you would not have to invest another penny in the M2 to use it regularly for another 40 years.
As long as you don't put any film in it, correct.
Ronny
Well-known
Yes, a bad move indeed.
Have a nice weekend.
Have a nice weekend.
leicamshooter
Established
Keep the M2. You may regret it.
Keep the M2. You may regret it.
Why would he regret it? He can always buy another one.
Roger Hicks
Veteran
Mad?
For me, yes.
For you, dunno.
Cheers,
R.
For me, yes.
For you, dunno.
Cheers,
R.
klapka
Established
Well I have both the M2 and the X100 and.. I love both. But if forced to choose, I'd go with the M2.
Don't give it away.
Don't give it away.
willie_901
Veteran
As long as you don't put any film in it, correct.
Not to mention repairs and CLAs. How practical will M2 repairs/CLA be 25 years from now?
paradoxbox
Well-known
repairs in 25 years? completely practical. i think, the parts are still out there and can be easily made if the original supply of parts ever dries up, which seems unlikely considering the huge number of cameras out there and the interchangeability of many parts from the m2 with newer cameras like the m6.
i tried the x100 at a camera shop but didn't like the handling much.
i think that the price of the camera is too high for now - that camera's price is going to crash like a sack of bricks over the next 2 or 3 years, yet the x100 does the same things i can do with my m3 or any other camera (except super high ISO)
if i need a compact camera i just use my ricoh GRD III with a viewfinder on top. for everything else i take my M3 or my Bessa-R or any other of my many cameras and snap away.
if you need super high-iso but you want a rangefinder styled camera get the x100 or a leica m9/m10. if you don't need super high iso then don't bother with the change.
i tried the x100 at a camera shop but didn't like the handling much.
i think that the price of the camera is too high for now - that camera's price is going to crash like a sack of bricks over the next 2 or 3 years, yet the x100 does the same things i can do with my m3 or any other camera (except super high ISO)
if i need a compact camera i just use my ricoh GRD III with a viewfinder on top. for everything else i take my M3 or my Bessa-R or any other of my many cameras and snap away.
if you need super high-iso but you want a rangefinder styled camera get the x100 or a leica m9/m10. if you don't need super high iso then don't bother with the change.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.