Sell the M2 and buy an X100 - a mad move?

Just think,in 5 years when the shutter breaks on the x100 you could buy back the m2,that should keep going for another 40years.

What makes you think a leaf shutter is going to break in 5 years? Is it so different from the leaf shutters used in film cameras? This digital camera hate is too much here sometimes. :rolleyes:
 
Well I have both the M2 and the X100 and.. I love both. But if forced to choose, I'd go with the M2.

Don't give it away.
 
repairs in 25 years? completely practical. i think, the parts are still out there and can be easily made if the original supply of parts ever dries up, which seems unlikely considering the huge number of cameras out there and the interchangeability of many parts from the m2 with newer cameras like the m6.

i tried the x100 at a camera shop but didn't like the handling much.

i think that the price of the camera is too high for now - that camera's price is going to crash like a sack of bricks over the next 2 or 3 years, yet the x100 does the same things i can do with my m3 or any other camera (except super high ISO)

if i need a compact camera i just use my ricoh GRD III with a viewfinder on top. for everything else i take my M3 or my Bessa-R or any other of my many cameras and snap away.

if you need super high-iso but you want a rangefinder styled camera get the x100 or a leica m9/m10. if you don't need super high iso then don't bother with the change.
 
Back
Top Bottom