Shimming the focusing screen on a D700

ssmc

Well-known
Local time
2:54 AM
Joined
Feb 2, 2009
Messages
596
My D700 (bought new) had an extremely annoying maladjustment between the VF and (very accurate) AF - when the VF showed a sharp image, the capture would be slightly OOF, and vice-versa. This problem absolutely drove me nuts and after a lot of testing and renting several lenses (Zeiss 100/2, Nikkor 135/2 DC and Sigma 150/2.8 macro) I eventually determined the focusing screen needed to be re-shimmed.

To cut to the chase, re-shimming the focusing screen was a total success and a lot easier than I expected. Other than being careful to handle the shims without bending or dropping them, it's really no more difficult than changing screens (just more time-consuming). By far the worst part was getting rid of the tiny specks of dust/lint/whatever that find their way onto the screen and the base of the prism while it's all apart, but repeated use of the Rocket blower and the L1 LumaMax eventually got it all spotless (shining the L1 through the eyepiece revealed the exact location of any dust on the prism).

Here is a pic of the setup I used: the small blue tool is for releasing the screen retaining wire (this one came from KatzEye), the Pec-Pad is to put the screen on (shiny side down) while it was out of the camera, and the tea-towel was to rest the body on upside-down to stop the shims dropping out; the steel rule was taped down at both ends and the desk lamp just provided a bit more light on the markings. I used a Tokina M100 as it is extremely sharp, the FL made seeing the rule markings much easier, and it has a very long focus throw. At this distance the widest this lens goes is f/3.5 but that still gives a pretty shallow DOF; a 50/1.4 would have been even better but then I would have needed a magnifying eyepiece to get decent accuracy. I wore non-powdered rubber gloves for the whole procedure and cleaned the tweezers with 100% isopropanol beforehand.

Whatever lens you use (an 85/1.4 would be great...), make sure to shoot it wide open or focus shift will confound the results!

original.jpg


The shims are color-code but for some weird reason the part # sequencing does not correspond to an increase in thickness:

1K603-374 - 0.15mm (copper)
1K603-373 - 0.20mm (brass)
1K603-372 - 0.10mm (silver/chrome)
1K603-384 - 0.05mm (copper - but easy to tell apart from the -374's as they are paper-thin)

I focused on the 500mm line as best I could in the VF and then switched to LV to check where it was really focused (in this case, about 5-6mm further away), repeating the process several times for each shim pack. This camera had 1x -373 shim and 1x -384 shim installed from the factory (0.25mm total). I'd already determined that since the VF was back-focusing, it required more/thicker shims, so I removed the -384 (only) and tried each successive thickness until I got it right - or as close as it could be given the limited range of thicknesses available. I ended up with 2x -373 shims (0.40mm total) - quite a large increase from the original. When this camera was sent to Nikon to have a few hot pixels mapped out under warranty they also adjusted the AF and it came back absolutely spot-on - I am stoked to report that I can now say the same about the viewfinder 😀

While this may look/sound daunting, anyone who has replaced a focsing screen could do this job, and (IMO) any serious users of manual-focus lenses should check their camera for VF/AF agreement and think about shimming it if they need to (go easy on the caffeine beforehand, though 😉). Considering I bought 2x sets of shims (which Nikon call "washers") for AUD23.68 (I didn't know what I was going to need and there was always the possibility of damaging one), this has to be the best-value upgrade to this camera I can think of, since I can now accurately focus MF lenses, even long ones, and tweaking AF-S lenses can now be done with complete confidence in the results - finally, WYSIWYG!

Hope someone finds this info useful
Scott
 
This is where the live view function is incredibly useful IMO ... I checked mine not long after I got it and it was close enough that I wasn't about to mess with it.
 
I've never run into a problem with the many Nikon F and F2 screeens on the F2's and F's that I have. I've used a 1000mm lens on them, all manual focus.

I wonder what the next screen will do in your camera. Is the problem with the camera, or with that partcilar screen. Having to adjust by 0.15mm is huge, that is what I typically use for a Russian lens made to the Contax standard to work with a Nikon RF.
 
Scott

Thank you for posting this. Did you get the shim kits from a Nikon dealer? I think I may have to try this with my D700 as there is a slight disagreement between what I get with MF vs AF and vice verse. I am talking about the original screen not a replacement. I was also wondering is there is a difference in thickness between the Katz Eye screen and the original Nikon one? I am kind of wondering if the standard to which screens are adjusted is a little lower on AF cameras than on MF cameras as the AF cameras are intended for and mostly used in AF mode. With MF cameras there was no option but to have them bang on. I never have run into this issue with any of my MF Nikon cameras before.

Bob
 
- Keith: you said it! Although, with the high-res screens on the newer DSLRs you can also just take a shot and review it immediately (which I did at first until I thought of using LV instead!)

- Jamie: along with the hot pixels, I supplied an explicit description of this exact problem to Nikon when it went in for a service (under warranty) and while the pixels were fixed (and the AF came back amazingly accurate) the VF was the same as before. I got the idea that this was something they may not have fully understood or did not want to tackle (as it is fairly labor-intensive), but either way I was unwilling to send it in again in case it came back worse or got damaged in transit. The screen itself was fine, though.

- Brian: My D300 was/is absolutley spot-on in this regard which is one of the things that twigged me to the solution, and like you, my film SLRs have had no such problems. I dunno what happened at the factory with my D700 but it was waaaayyy out... as fas as different screens go, well, if I ever decide to change it I now have a bunch of shims to adjust it with 🙂 Maybe the screen itself is out of spec for thickness, but without knowing what that dimension is suppose to be and risking damage to the laser-matte surface by miking it, I guess I'll never know... or as you say it could be something in the camera causing the misalignment. It would be interesting to know what most D700's are shimmed at

- Bob: I had to order them specially as the local distributor (in Australia) did not stock them and actually told me they had never had to order them (!), but they did get them for me and in pretty quick time too. The KatzEye screen I bought seemed to have exactly the same problem as the stock screen; the reason I stopped using it was that for some reason I just could not get used to the split-prism, despite having used screens with split-prism/microprism screens for many years on film SLRs. I think you are spot-on with your comment about AF vs MF adjustment accuracy BTW.
 
Thanks for the info. I emailed Nikon Canada and was told to contact their parts department to check on availability and price. They will be getting a call later today. Yea, I have a replacement split screen but I too think I would prefer to use the stock screen for some strange reason. I am using a DK-17, I think that is what it is called, eye piece magnifier also.

Bob
 
Back
Top Bottom