qqphotos
Well-known
Well I've just split up a 400 foot roll of it so I'll be messing with it a bunch more if I can motivate myself.
dave lackey
Veteran
For weeks I have been reading through all 110 pages and I am only halfway through this thread. Wow! 👍👍👍
The bad news is, on returning to using Eastman 5222 film, I need a little help in fine tuning my developing protocol. Yes, I know everyone has their own but it might be helpful if I can see where my current understanding is, both good and bad, for only a single one-shot developer, Ilford DD-X. Your input will save me a lot of time. Thanks in advance!😇
Here is where I am at the moment…
Developing Eastman 5222 XX (with Ilford DD-X)
EI = 250
Developer
Dilution: 1:4
Time: 6min. 30sec @ 70°F/21°F
Agitation: 6 inversions first 30 sec.
+ 2 inversions each min.
Stop Bath
Water only
Time: 2 minutes
Agitation: 6 inversions
Fixer
Ilford Rapid Fix
Dilution: 1:4
Time: 6 minutes
Agitation: 6 inversions first 30 sec
+2 inversions each min.
Wash
Water only
Agitation:
Fill Tank, 5 inversions and Dump
Fill Tank, 10 inversions and Dump
Fill Tank, 20 inversions and Dump
Fill Tank, 30 inversions and Dump
Fill Tank, 40 inversions and Dump
Rinse 5 minutes
Photo Flo
Dilution: 5ml / 500ml water
Time: 2 minutes
Agitation: 3 inversions first 30 sec.
Rinse.
Hang to dry.
The bad news is, on returning to using Eastman 5222 film, I need a little help in fine tuning my developing protocol. Yes, I know everyone has their own but it might be helpful if I can see where my current understanding is, both good and bad, for only a single one-shot developer, Ilford DD-X. Your input will save me a lot of time. Thanks in advance!😇
Here is where I am at the moment…
Developing Eastman 5222 XX (with Ilford DD-X)
EI = 250
Developer
Dilution: 1:4
Time: 6min. 30sec @ 70°F/21°F
Agitation: 6 inversions first 30 sec.
+ 2 inversions each min.
Stop Bath
Water only
Time: 2 minutes
Agitation: 6 inversions
Fixer
Ilford Rapid Fix
Dilution: 1:4
Time: 6 minutes
Agitation: 6 inversions first 30 sec
+2 inversions each min.
Wash
Water only
Agitation:
Fill Tank, 5 inversions and Dump
Fill Tank, 10 inversions and Dump
Fill Tank, 20 inversions and Dump
Fill Tank, 30 inversions and Dump
Fill Tank, 40 inversions and Dump
Rinse 5 minutes
Photo Flo
Dilution: 5ml / 500ml water
Time: 2 minutes
Agitation: 3 inversions first 30 sec.
Rinse.
Hang to dry.
Freakscene
Obscure member
For weeks I have been reading through all 110 pages and I am only halfway through this thread. Wow! 👍👍👍
The bad news is, on returning to using Eastman 5222 film, I need a little help in fine tuning my developing protocol. Yes, I know everyone has their own but it might be helpful if I can see where my current understanding is, both good and bad, for only a single one-shot developer, Ilford DD-X. Your input will save me a lot of time. Thanks in advance!😇
Here is where I am at the moment…
Developing Eastman 5222 XX (with Ilford DD-X)
EI = 250
Developer
Dilution: 1:4
Time: 6min. 30sec @ 70°F/21°F
Agitation: 6 inversions first 30 sec.
+ 2 inversions each min.
Stop Bath
Water only
Time: 2 minutes
Agitation: 6 inversions
Fixer
Ilford Rapid Fix
Dilution: 1:4
Time: 6 minutes
Agitation: 6 inversions first 30 sec
+2 inversions each min.
Wash
Water only
Agitation:
Fill Tank, 5 inversions and Dump
Fill Tank, 10 inversions and Dump
Fill Tank, 20 inversions and Dump
Fill Tank, 30 inversions and Dump
Fill Tank, 40 inversions and Dump
Rinse 5 minutes
Photo Flo
Dilution: 5ml / 500ml water
Time: 2 minutes
Agitation: 3 inversions first 30 sec.
Rinse.
Hang to dry.
That looks fine Dave. What problems have you encountered to suggest that you need to ‘fine tune’ your process. If you do all that consistently, all you need to do is match your exposure and development. Less exposure and more development to increase contrast, more exposure and less development to decrease contrast.
Marty
dave lackey
Veteran
Thanks!👍👍👍
I’m not quite sure what I need yet.. the film I used before was expired, and the meter on the FTN has been wonky lately. But the real question is using DD-X with 5222… haven’t done that yet as I always used D76 and Rodinal in the past.
So, with new 5222 film that I will be ordering, I hope to have a workable protocol. If this looks good, I will give it a whirl soon. 😃
I generally shoot TMax 100 and Acros II 100.
I’m not quite sure what I need yet.. the film I used before was expired, and the meter on the FTN has been wonky lately. But the real question is using DD-X with 5222… haven’t done that yet as I always used D76 and Rodinal in the past.
So, with new 5222 film that I will be ordering, I hope to have a workable protocol. If this looks good, I will give it a whirl soon. 😃
I generally shoot TMax 100 and Acros II 100.
Slumgullion
Well-known
I'm a big fan of 5222 in Xtol 1:1. Wonderful gradation, sharpness and grain. The bloom in the highlights is a real added treat.
Dad by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Zuzu & Brian by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Jenny by Jim Fischer, on Flickr



Slumgullion
Well-known
qqphotos
Well-known
This seems within range for DD-X, though you don't say how you're printing or scanning. Almost everything I shoot now ends up digitized using a sony mirrorless camera and macro lens - that pulls out almost any detectable density in thin areas of the film so I rate at box speed (250 for daylight) and don't worry much about shadow detail. I develop about the same as you're proposing, 7 minutes at 68F, and the negatives for me retain sufficient shadow detail without highlights becoming too difficult to deal with. The grain structure with DD-X looks the best among the developers I've tried. I think if I were printing with an enlarger I'd probably try for a bit more contrast in development.For weeks I have been reading through all 110 pages and I am only halfway through this thread. Wow! 👍👍👍
The bad news is, on returning to using Eastman 5222 film, I need a little help in fine tuning my developing protocol. Yes, I know everyone has their own but it might be helpful if I can see where my current understanding is, both good and bad, for only a single one-shot developer, Ilford DD-X. Your input will save me a lot of time. Thanks in advance!😇
Here is where I am at the moment…
Developing Eastman 5222 XX (with Ilford DD-X)
EI = 250
Developer
Dilution: 1:4
Time: 6min. 30sec @ 70°F/21°F
Agitation: 6 inversions first 30 sec.
+ 2 inversions each min.
I'd like to play with it more in Xtol, my first attempts gave negatives so flat I thought there was something wrong, but I think I just got steered wrong with a starting time.
The other developer I found to be really nice with 5222, weirdly, is PMK.
Bingley
Veteran
Just developed a couple more rolls of Cinestill XX. FWIW, here’s the development sequence I followed, which is based on the recommendation of Alan Ross, who was Ansel Adams’ darkroom assistant in the 1970s and still prints from Adams’ negatives for the Ansel Adams Gallery in Yosemite. I took a printmaking workshop with Alan last October and learned a ton.
I exposed Cinestill XX at 200, even though I developed in Ilfotec DDX. That gives a small amount of overexposure.
Once the chemistry is mixed up and the film in a two roll Patterson tank, I followed this procedure:
- Wash film in water for 1 minute, continuous agitation. Dump.
- Develop film following agitation procedures recommended for the developer. For DDX, Ilford recommends 4 inversions in the first ten seconds followed by 4 inversions on the minute thereafter. So that’s what I did. Dump the developer when done.
- Stop bath (Ilford Ilfostop), 25 seconds, continuous agitation; reuse the stop bath.
- Fixer (Ilford Rapid Fix), 5 minutes, following same agitation procedure as used w/ the developer; re-uese developer unless it’s over the hill.
- Wash film, 1 min., continuous agitation, then dump.
- Hypo clearing agent, 2 mins. w/ 15 secs continuous agitation on the minute.
- Rinse film, either 5 min. continuous agitation or the Ilford method. I use the Ilford method: 5 inversions, then dump; 10 inversions, then dump; 20 inversions, then dump. For the final 20 inversions, I use distilled water, to avoid water spots (I live in an area w/ fairly hard water).
- Foto-flow soak: soak each reel in distilled water w/ a few drops of Foto-flow (or Ilford equivalent), for a couple of minutes.
- Hang the film to dry.
I should note that I develop all my negatives for scanning.
I’m now using this sequence with other films, and am pretty pleased w/ the results. YMMV.
I exposed Cinestill XX at 200, even though I developed in Ilfotec DDX. That gives a small amount of overexposure.
Once the chemistry is mixed up and the film in a two roll Patterson tank, I followed this procedure:
- Wash film in water for 1 minute, continuous agitation. Dump.
- Develop film following agitation procedures recommended for the developer. For DDX, Ilford recommends 4 inversions in the first ten seconds followed by 4 inversions on the minute thereafter. So that’s what I did. Dump the developer when done.
- Stop bath (Ilford Ilfostop), 25 seconds, continuous agitation; reuse the stop bath.
- Fixer (Ilford Rapid Fix), 5 minutes, following same agitation procedure as used w/ the developer; re-uese developer unless it’s over the hill.
- Wash film, 1 min., continuous agitation, then dump.
- Hypo clearing agent, 2 mins. w/ 15 secs continuous agitation on the minute.
- Rinse film, either 5 min. continuous agitation or the Ilford method. I use the Ilford method: 5 inversions, then dump; 10 inversions, then dump; 20 inversions, then dump. For the final 20 inversions, I use distilled water, to avoid water spots (I live in an area w/ fairly hard water).
- Foto-flow soak: soak each reel in distilled water w/ a few drops of Foto-flow (or Ilford equivalent), for a couple of minutes.
- Hang the film to dry.
I should note that I develop all my negatives for scanning.
I’m now using this sequence with other films, and am pretty pleased w/ the results. YMMV.
Bingley
Veteran
Here are a couple of sample photos made with Cinestill XX and developed using the procedure described above:
Lake Tahoe Dam by Steve Macfarlane, on Flickr
Pockets by Steve Macfarlane, on Flickr


Freakscene
Obscure member
If you’re interested in trying Xtol, Adox XT-3 is an improved Xtol substitute. I recommend it. I have n]o affiliation with Adox, just impressed with this product. You can get it in a 1L pouch too.
dave lackey
Veteran
Steve, these look great, thanks for posting. I will use this in the next roll!Here are a couple of sample photos made with Cinestill XX and developed using the procedure described above:
Lake Tahoe Dam by Steve Macfarlane, on Flickr
Pockets by Steve Macfarlane, on Flickr
Btw, what developer dilution did you use?
Bingley
Veteran
Thanks, Dave. I used 1:4 dilution. I should add that I developed the film for 7 minutes.Steve, these look great, thanks for posting. I will use this in the next roll!
Btw, what developer dilution did you use?
Slumgullion
Well-known
Very useful information!If you’re interested in trying Xtol, Adox XT-3 is an improved Xtol substitute. I recommend it. I have n]o affiliation with Adox, just impressed with this product. You can get it in a 1L pouch too.
qqphotos
Well-known
When you say 1:4 do you mean the recommendation on the package (one part concentrate plus four parts water) or are you modifying the dilution to one part concentrate to four parts total (which would be one part concentrate plus three parts water)? Sorry about being pedantic, but I want to keep experimenting with this and there's always the risk of misinterpreting dilutions.Thanks, Dave. I used 1:4 dilution. I should add that I developed the film for 7 minutes.
Nokton48
Veteran
Oh No! I've done it now !! The EL/M is loaded with 120 XX, with 80mm F2.8 black T* Zeiss Planar. Adding a Bay 50 Hasselblad Medium Yellow Filter, 80mm Black Shade, and the original Meter Prism (reads out directly in EV's). Microprism Screen.
Ready to roll.
XX 500ELM 80mm A12 Meter Prism by Nokton48, on Flickr
Next a roll will go into my Black Plaubel Makina II with the 100mm F2.9 Orthometar, Medium Yellow Plaubel Filter. EI 200 is fast enough to shoot medium format XX in interesting light. Sort of going back to the roots of this thread, and screw mount 35mm's. Except bigger
Ready to roll.

Next a roll will go into my Black Plaubel Makina II with the 100mm F2.9 Orthometar, Medium Yellow Plaubel Filter. EI 200 is fast enough to shoot medium format XX in interesting light. Sort of going back to the roots of this thread, and screw mount 35mm's. Except bigger
Bingley
Veteran
I should have written 1+4, which is more precise. I’m specifically referring to the dilution instructions in the DDX data sheet, which also provide dilution instructions at the 1+4 strength for tanks of different sizes.When you say 1:4 do you mean the recommendation on the package (one part concentrate plus four parts water) or are you modifying the dilution to one part concentrate to four parts total (which would be one part concentrate plus three parts water)? Sorry about being pedantic, but I want to keep experimenting with this and there's always the risk of misinterpreting dilutions.
dave lackey
Veteran
Update: a minor one. Yes, I managed to develop my latest roll of Eastman 5222 (DD-X) and scanned the negatives.
In spite of my M2 being loaded with other film for a specific project, and despite the old FTN meter, I did get some good results. Next roll I will use the protocol Steve presented above and a different camera with a better meter to see if the expired film still performs well.
From the garden:
Magic Mushroom

Gnome

I am looking forward to getting this film working like clockwork!
Dave
In spite of my M2 being loaded with other film for a specific project, and despite the old FTN meter, I did get some good results. Next roll I will use the protocol Steve presented above and a different camera with a better meter to see if the expired film still performs well.
From the garden:
Magic Mushroom

Gnome

I am looking forward to getting this film working like clockwork!
Dave
Slumgullion
Well-known
How is everyone breaking down 400' (or larger) rolls? I just have a boring, old 100' bulk loader.
Tendrils by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Silvershot Vineyards by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Silvershot Vineyards by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Nikon F2, Voigtlander 40mm f/2 Ultron, Eastman-5222, Xtol 1:1
The lack of anti-halation layer (or very weak anti-halation layer) is a serious draw for me. The highlight bloom is one of the reasons I love this film (and something like Fompan 400).



Nikon F2, Voigtlander 40mm f/2 Ultron, Eastman-5222, Xtol 1:1
The lack of anti-halation layer (or very weak anti-halation layer) is a serious draw for me. The highlight bloom is one of the reasons I love this film (and something like Fompan 400).
Nokton48
Veteran

SRT 85mm MC F1.7 Rokkor XX D23. It is good to use the SRTs. Very enjoyable
fdu
Established
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.