-vin-
Established
As in the title.
And a question: should I prefer a canon 35/2 over a skopar 35/2.5?
And a question: should I prefer a canon 35/2 over a skopar 35/2.5?
wallace
Well-known
I have no idea, but would like to know it too!
ferider
Veteran
You should prefer the Ultron over the Canon 
RayPA
Ignore It (It'll go away)
I like the size of the CS 35/2.5. It's a very capable lens. Some find it too contrasty, which I would agree that it is indeed contrasty and sharp. It's very nicely priced and a great size. On a M4-P, it slides nicely into a jacket pocket.
.
.
Last edited:
vrgard
Well-known
Well, if we're going to open this up to slightly slower lenses, there's also the Canon 35/2.8 to consider, as well as the Leica 35/2.8 Summaron.
-Randy
-Randy
RayPA
Ignore It (It'll go away)
M. Valdemar
Well-known
Don't have photos handy but EXCELLENT lens. You would be very wise to buy one.
RayPA
Ignore It (It'll go away)
I seem to remember some images taken with this lens showing it to have the infamous "fish scale" bokeh on oof specular highlights/lights. (????) If you plan on using it wide open a lot in this type of condition maybe that's a consideration. I've only had mine for about two weeks, and I've only shot with it stopped down.
KEH
Well-known
Here's a favorite from my gallery:
The flare at the top is probably partly the sensor (R-D1) rather than the lens. I have seen examples of fish-scale bokeh on this site, but not in my work.
Small, light, very good.
Cheers,
Kirk

The flare at the top is probably partly the sensor (R-D1) rather than the lens. I have seen examples of fish-scale bokeh on this site, but not in my work.
Small, light, very good.
Cheers,
Kirk
-vin-
Established
I bought it. It should arrive in a week or so... 
-vin-
Established
ferider said:You should prefer the Ultron over the Canon![]()
I think size is completely different... And I'm a small-size-lenses guy.
back alley
IMAGES
KEH said:Here's a favorite from my gallery:
![]()
The flare at the top is probably partly the sensor (R-D1) rather than the lens. I have seen examples of fish-scale bokeh on this site, but not in my work.
Small, light, very good.
Cheers,
Kirk
wow, i like that shot!
-vin-
Established
back alley said:wow, i like that shot!
yes, really nice!
but it's more from the photographer than from the lens. a good descriptions of those moments after a rainfall.
back alley
IMAGES
burninfilm
Well-known
Here's a few shots from the well-used Canon 35/2 that I used to have. I'll definitely find another example in the future, as it was a really neat, compact lens that produced good results. I suggest that anyone using this lens be ABSOLUTELY sure that your fingers are out of the way. The lens is so compact, that when I first started using it, I had several frames with the lower right corner blocked off. A small hood would probably help this, as well as reducing flare from this classic wide-angle Canon.









Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.