p.giannakis
Pan Giannakis
Given to me by a friend

chomski
jojo
http://www.flickr.com/photos/chomski69/ j'ai commencé a utiliser les telemetriques avec plusieurs zorki 4 et mir ce sont de bon boitier mais finalement je l'ai ai vendus pour acheter un fed 1 que j'ai vendu egalement maintenant j'ai adopté un zorki 6 tres agreable tres compact utilsé avec un jupiter 3 de1957 et un JUpiter 12 et egalement un KIEV 4 de 1975 avec un jupiter 12 et 8 un regal ce telemetre le zorki 6 est en reparation actuellement en complement un leica iiic de 1949 et summar ainsi qu'un elmar 9 cm je les utilise avec autant de plair pour chacun sans distinction de marque
Mr_Flibble
In Tabulas Argenteas Refero
My two latest additions
Zorki 4K and a FED-NKVD 1d from the summer of 1939


Zorki 4K and a FED-NKVD 1d from the summer of 1939
stratcat
Well-known
Last edited:
reagan
hey, they're only Zorkis
catintheflat ~ good looking Kievs there. Maybe share more info later about your DIY J.12 VF, ay? Looks interesting.
polabe ~ very nice Zorki.4; and the meter looks right at home there. What kind of meter is it?
chomski ~ sounds like you've got a good group of RFs. Barnacks and Zorkis go together well for me. (But Kievs have always been that itch I haven't scratched ... yet.)
Welcome aboard, you guyz!
polabe ~ very nice Zorki.4; and the meter looks right at home there. What kind of meter is it?
chomski ~ sounds like you've got a good group of RFs. Barnacks and Zorkis go together well for me. (But Kievs have always been that itch I haven't scratched ... yet.)
Welcome aboard, you guyz!
reagan
hey, they're only Zorkis
I really like the looks of the *trim-less* covers on those old FEDs & Zorkis. I have one, a Zorki.1, in a drawer awaiting a round pressure plate.My two latest additions ... Zorki 4K and a FED-NKVD 1d from the summer of 1939
chomski
jojo
http://www.flickr.com/photos/chomski69/ I started to use rangefinders with several zork 4 and mir are good case but I've finally sold to buy one I fed a I also sold now adopted a very pleasant 6 zork, unwanted very compact with a 3 de1957 Jupiter and Jupiter 12 and also a KIEV 4, 1975 with a Jupiter 12 and 8 that 6 zork That IS the rangefinder leica iiic Currently in repair a complement of 1949 and a Summar and Elmar 9 cm I use 'em with as much to please each. Hope that the translation I Will not Be too mauvaise.peux t 'we explain to post a photograph on this site
zhang xk
Well-known
konicaman
konicaman
Commemorative Z4 from one of our fellow members (hope he doesn't mind posting this) after CLA - I mostly use the FSU camera's with Leitz lenses like the summitar and the ltm summaron:
![]()
My camera sure looks nice with that Summaron
Thanks for a job well done - it works like a charm!
RanceEric
The name is Rance
Moscow 5

oris
Newbie
ronnies
Well-known
stratcat
Well-known
David Hughes
David Hughes
A FED 1 with the f/2 50mm FED lens.
The lens hood came from a flea market and has, as you can probably see, a piece of sticky tape on it to ensure a perfect fit.

The lens hood came from a flea market and has, as you can probably see, a piece of sticky tape on it to ensure a perfect fit.
Coldkennels
Barnack-toting Brit.
A FED 1 with the f/2 50mm FED lens.
![]()
The lens hood came from a flea market and has, as you can probably see, a piece of sticky tape on it to ensure a perfect fit.
Wow... the collapsible 50/2. That's a beautiful, beautiful thing you've got there, David. I'm a very envious man right now.
David Hughes
David Hughes
Wow... the collapsible 50/2. That's a beautiful, beautiful thing you've got there, David. I'm a very envious man right now.
Cor! TVM. Regards, David
Coldkennels
Barnack-toting Brit.
David, am I correct in saying that lens is pre-war, and as a result, not useable on any standard Fed body?
David Hughes
David Hughes
David, am I correct in saying that lens is pre-war, and as a result, not useable on any standard Fed body?
Hi,
I've no idea and can only say that I've used it on the Leica CL (which had film in it a month or so ago). The problem is I'm recovering the use of my right hand after an operation and a lot of things I'd like to do are a bit beyond me at present. Luckily I can type as badly with my left hand...
It was working well when I took pictures at 1 metre range at f/4.5 and so on. There's a thread about it somewhere but here's a photo taken with it on the CL;

FP4 Plus, btw, and scanned etc by Ilford but resized very much downwards by me.
Regards, David
johannielscom
Snorting silver salts
This indeed is prewar and not standardized. I have one too and it is spot on with the FED-S body but miles off on any other body, not to mention Leica!
My kit also consists of a 100/6.3 and a 28/4.5, both uncoupled. I'm short one pre-war front and one rear cap, and ofcourse those finders for both lenses :bang: impossible to find!
My kit also consists of a 100/6.3 and a 28/4.5, both uncoupled. I'm short one pre-war front and one rear cap, and ofcourse those finders for both lenses :bang: impossible to find!
David Hughes
David Hughes
The problem is that with any other camera we could easily take the back off and use a piece of frosted glass to check things. And thanks to the sprung back plate we can't even check the flange front to film distance on our cameras.
Multiply the number of lenses by the number of bodies and I get an impossible number of combinations to test. Doing 6 standard shots for each lens I'd be able to check 6 lenses per film but the thought frightens me. And life's too short.
As for standards and non standards, I seem to have been very lucky with mine. It's not much of a bother, I seldom shoot at f/2 (about 3% of last years shots) and so don't worry much because I can pick a modern camera for serious work.
Regards, David
Multiply the number of lenses by the number of bodies and I get an impossible number of combinations to test. Doing 6 standard shots for each lens I'd be able to check 6 lenses per film but the thought frightens me. And life's too short.
As for standards and non standards, I seem to have been very lucky with mine. It's not much of a bother, I seldom shoot at f/2 (about 3% of last years shots) and so don't worry much because I can pick a modern camera for serious work.
Regards, David
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.