Be careful, there are a few 127 TLR gems out there and they are inexpensive enough to get them all.
😉
The Primo Jr is my favorite. This is one from it.
Ah, memories! One of my aunts had a '44' way back in the day - I remember it being taken out at family picnics and Sunday lunches when I was a wee nipper, so late 1950s. A good French Canadian Catholic, she traveled to religious novenas in Canada and USA, to Europe to see cathedrals, to Jerusalem to pray at the wailing wall, and she used the '44' as an 'aide-memoire' of her trips. The result was a few thousand negatives, all processed by the local chemist, probably with Kodak Tri-Chem packs. Also at least a ton of small prints, all well exposed and needle sharp.
I recall she never used a meter but worked from the basic exposure details printed on the boxes of roll films. She was widowed during WW2 and never remarried, so she had an adequate pension and lived well, but knew the value of money - a few years later when I was keener on photography, I asked her why she hadn't bought a Rolleiflex 127. Her answer was typical for her - "Too expensive!"
Sadly, she left us in 2003. The camera has vanished. It was still around in 2006 when I last visited the family home, unused for many years and in an old vinyl camera bag with a few accessories (a strap, a lens hood, filters) some ancient 127 rolls). I was tempted to nab it, but I didn't. The house and property were sold a few years later and are no longer in the family. I've long wondered if that camera went to the local church charity shop or got thrown out. Knowing as I did this aunt and how 'thrifty' (as kind as she was, an 'm' word is more appropriate for her), I'm surprised she didn't sell it when she no longer wanted it, but no - she left it in that bag in a hall cupboard.
In its heyday the Rolleiflex 4x4 was marketed as a ladies' TLR. I recall it was for the reason of its small size - it easily fitted into the gals' handbags, which were big holdalls in the '50s and '60s. Now the iPhone has taken over that market. Odd that nobody has thought of making one as a TLR phone...
Okay, let's return to the original post. The sharpness and tonal quality in your image is typical of what those small cameras can produce. In 2009 I Inherited all my aunt's negatives and over the years I've printed a couple of hundred (the family images) for my family. She liked Verichrome Pan and Plus-X, then both popular in 127, now no longer made. Two excellent films gone the way of the dodo.
Now and then I see '44' Rolleis on Ebay, but never a Primo. There must be more of those 127 babes around. If anyone reading this has one, please post - the information will be of interest to many of us who remember those fine small TLR cameras of their time.
I do like the idea of putting 35mm film in a TLR. I wonder if my two Rolleiflex Ts could be fixed to be used for this. Oop - now I remember the manufacturers (F&H in Germany) did make a Rolleikin to convert these cameras to '35 use. In fact I have one somewhere at home, almost never used but there you are, '35 on call. Silly me...