Show us your recent Panoramic photos!

[dourbalistar]

Pentax 6x7, S-M-C Takumar 6x7 55mm f/3.5, Panoramic Adapter, Kentmere Pan 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.


2021.08.28 Roll #289-06433-Pano-3-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr

 

[gcap]

Lefkada, Greece. Fuji GX617, 180mm, Kodak Portra:

 

[Godfrey]

Kodak Retina IIIc, Ilford HP5 @ ISO 100, two frame stitch

Saturday Morning by the Cafe - San Jose 2021​

 

[TimPrebble]

Mt Sunday, Erewhon (aka Edoras for Tolkien nerdlingers)
Fujifilm TX2/XPAN2 with Kodak Ektar100

 

[newtorf]

Ilford FP4, HC-110

 

[OlivierAOP]

Fuji GW690iii at f/16 pano crop, Fuji 400H

000066760001-1 by Olivier, on Flickr

 

[dourbalistar]

Pentax 6x7, S-M-C Takumar 6x7 55mm f/3.5, Panoramic Adapter, Kentmere Pan 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.


2021.08.28 Roll #289-06435-Pano-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr

 

[newtorf]

Ilford FP4, HC-110.

 

[TimPrebble]

Mt Sunday, Erewhon (aka Edoras for Tolkien nerdlingers) by tim prebble, on Flickr

 

[gcap]

Fuji GX617, 180mm, Kodak Portra:

 

[neal3k]

Fuji G617 with Kodak Ektar 100.

Fall is Coming to the Lake by Neal Wellons, on Flickr

 

[gcap]

Fuji GX617, 180mm, Kodak Portra:

 

[neal3k]

FT-2 with light leak.

Tractors, tractors, tractors by Neal Wellons, on Flickr

Horizon 202
Swing-Lens Swinging by Neal Wellons, on Flickr

 

[snaefell]

Fassade of the Industry House in Copenhagen. Xpan, 45mm on FT-12.

 

[newtorf]

 

[chambrenoire]

Untitled by Mattia Marchi, on Flickr

 

[gcap]

Fuji GX617, 90mm & 180mm, Kodak Portra:

https://flic.kr/p/2mv7tky


https://flic.kr/p/2mv7tky

 

[Rob-F]

Apart from the novelty of it, how desirable is it to include the sprocket holes. Isn't it something one will quickly tire of? It seems to call attention to the film, at the expense of the subject. Agree, or disagree?

 

[jon.oman]

Apart from the novelty of it, how desirable is it to include the sprocket holes. Isn't it something one will quickly tire of? It seems to call attention to the film, at the expense of the subject. Agree, or disagree?

I think the sprocket holes detract from the image.

 

[Godfrey]

I agree: I don't think the sprocket holes add anything in the general case. They might make sense if you're doing a layout with a technical photographic theme, used sparingly, but then you're really highlighting the film/format technology rather than the photograph's content.

G