Following is my highly-opinionated take on the Contax vs Leica shutter designs.....
The Contax shutters, both pre- and post-war, are masterpieces of mechanical design, of great complexity, and made to challenging tolerances: truly splendid machines when serviced properly. And you won't burn a hole through them.
But the Leica shutter is a better design for the job the camera needs to do in the real world. It is cruder, more subject to the sync problems inherent in a shutter which doesn't expose the whole frame at the same time, and yes, you CAN burn a hole through it. But it is better because it is far simpler. There are far fewer moving parts, fewer bits that are subject to dirt and changing viscosity of lubricants.
Prewar Contaxes burn out shutter tapes, and are subject to uneven exposures dependent on the moving friction of the tapes. For the shutter to work properly, the tapes need to high levels of static friction and low levels of dynamic friction. Postwar Contaxes don't have the same tape reliability problem, but seem to have just as many whirly bits that need to do their job to operate the shutter as before, and are notoriously subject to capping at high shutter speeds when the complex gear train gets a bit sluggish.
So if you are looking for the ultimate precision when just serviced, go for the Contax design. If you need something that will continue to give approximately correct exposures for a very long time, under a wide range of conditions, the Leica design is the way to go. Or even better, take the Leica design and replace the cloth curtains with metal. How often do you hear of a Nikon F shutter messing up?
Cheers,
Dez