Sorry all, but here we go, with another "what should I buy" question.

Vickko

Veteran
Local time
5:57 AM
Joined
Oct 14, 2005
Messages
2,826
Location
Canada
Sorry all, but here we go, with another "what should I buy" question.

I've had an RD1 for a month.

So what printer would your recommend?

My needs are:
- don't want to spend time researching until I go insane, am looking for the wisdom of those who have "gone before me"
- don't want to spend much time fiddling with post-processing photos
- want to print them straight-off, and am currently using the high-res jpeg option (not RAW)
- want stunning prints
- large prints (larger than 8x10) wouldn't be a factor
- want quality and reliability
- may upgrade in future when I get more time

Thanks all
Vick
 
>look into continuous ink systems

I strongly disagree. CIS is best for high volume printing and are hardly ever hassle-free. OEM cartridges will be more expensive but the lack of headaches is often worth it.

Also, wanting "stunning prints" without "fiddling with post-processing" is something of an oxymoron. Images directly from any digital camera will never be as good as they will be after some intelligent post-processing (ie., the application of levels/curves, contrast, and sharpening).

The printer (Epson R2400) I use is probably not the ticket for you, Vick, since it makes prints larger then you expressed a need for, so I'll leave specific recommendations to others.
 
AusDLK said:
>look into continuous ink systems

Also, wanting "stunning prints" without "fiddling with post-processing" is something of an oxymoron. Images directly from any digital camera will never be as good as they will be after some intelligent post-processing (ie., the application of levels/curves, contrast, and sharpening).


Thanks for the reply.

I spend too much of my life sitting in front of a computer screaming at my outsource partner, and too much of my life in front of a computer at home on non-photographic pursuits. More time in front of a computer just isn't appealing.

But I know what you mean regarding post processing.

Also leads to the discussion of buying a good monitor; my computer is the "company issue" laptop. Last thing I want to do is spend money on computing gear.

Sigh.


Vick
 
Vick,

you might be on the wrong path here - you contradict yourself by using a digital camera but not wanting to use the computer to get good images.

If all you want to do is print straight out of the camera, then buy a Kodak Easyshare - or whatever they are called these days. They come with their own printer and all you need to do is press a button.

The RD-1 will require post processing in order to get good prints - no way around it. Most pictures should not take more than 3-5 minutes each to get them right, but you have to invest that time in front of the computer.

Why didn't you stick with film - just frop the film of at your camera shop and pick it up two hours later and you have the prints!
 
FWIW I use an Epson 1290 as someone mentioned above and I get excellent prints. The printer's now 2-3 years old and I'll replace it this year with either the 1400 (dye-based) or the R1800 (pigment-based for permanence). I have no trouble printing direct from Photoshop with no special software.

For A4, and speed, I bought a Canon iP 4200 when I was in New Zealand for a few months last year and needed a printer. It was very good, cheap and reliable and very quick compared to the Epson. My only reservation at all is that the colours were a bit strong for my taste, but you can use the driver to tone them down if you want.
 
Back
Top Bottom