For the feller that just had one come in on his camera - get it cleaned before you judge it. That haze kills the lesn for me a lot. After cleaning, much sharper and defined. I think it gets a bad rap because it's an 70+ year old lens that normally needs some TLC before use.
a little bit off topic but in doing a little research I was sad to see that Donna Michelle had passed away in 2004 at age 58. that cover shown in charjohncarter excellent photo has to be one of the most iconic Playboy covers ever and he certainly made good use of it in his shot.
I like the way the photographs of HelenHill (the parking arcade) and also Dirojas (both photographs) show texture: granularity in the photograph helps us to feel the surface of the object. I suppose Dirojas's photographs are cropped (or at least the second one is); there is no way to get that close to an object with a RF camera. Does the Summar's "signature" help achieve these kind of shots, or is it largely a matter of film-developer choice?
Edit: looking back over the thread, I wish to add ChipMcD's shot of the girders to the above comment, and also to say that I really like all the shots posted. They seem to manage a proper blend of photographic qualities with subject matter.
Sanders McNew posted a couple of threads a couple of years ago with some fantastic shots from a summar. I'm away from my PC at the moment, maybe someone could post links to them. I recall he had a summar that had been cleaned by Sherry Krauter.