Summicron-C 40mm Action

@ Maddox, Steve,

Lovely Photos !
The 40 cron/ rokkor is just so good, renders crisp, sharp , tres 1970’s signature,
never lets You down, a tiny compact workhorse
 
When using a 40mm on an M-series, would you use the 35mm of 50mm frame lines?

Somewhere in between ? Guesstimate ?

The frame line selector on the M brings up the 50/75 frame line pair by default with the Summicron-C 40mm (and M-Rokkor 40mm) lens. Many folks I know file the cam on the lens a little bit so that it brings up the 35/135mm frame line pair because a 40mm lens FoV is a bit closer to a 35mm lens than a 50mm lens.

I've never bothered with filing the cam, I just shoot 'tight' with it on an M knowing that it will capture a bit more than I see in the frame lines. Of course, with M4-2 and most digital Ms, I can just hit the frame line selector lever to see the 35mm frame lines temporarily if I want to see the outer limits of what the lens will see... then I have to shoot a little 'loose' to be sure I don't inadvertently crop out something important.

G
 
The frame line selector on the M brings up the 50/75 frame line pair by default with the Summicron-C 40mm (and M-Rokkor 40mm) lens. Many folks I know file the cam on the lens a little bit so that it brings up the 35/135mm frame line pair because a 40mm lens FoV is a bit closer to a 35mm lens than a 50mm lens.

G

I did file mine. The 40mm covers a bit less than the 35mm frame on an M2, M4, M4P, and M5. on the M6, M7, MP, and M9, the coverage is just about exact for distances of about 2 meters or more.

For me, the improved accuracy on the bodies I mentioned is my whole reason for owning a 40mm.
 
Personally I always shot with 35mm frame lines on both my M2 and M4-2, sometimes I thought about it other times not so much. Generally speaking I think it gave me better compositions due to filling out the frame better
 
Lake Geneva

Lake Geneva

med_U48596I1544214416.SEQ.0.jpg




Leica CL + Summicron C
 
Another happy user with the Summicron-C
I discovered it newly. Images taken with M240. I'm impressed about the overall sharpness. Better than with Rollei Sonnar 40/2.8 which I acquired in 2006 and was never really sharp, and flared worse. I sold this lens due to growing internal haze. This Summicron-C is still very clear, and the mounting is reasonable solid for such a lightweight lens of this age.

L1000968-1-sw-k.jpg


L1000986-1-Neuweilnau-k.jpg
 
@ Maddox, Steve,

Lovely Photos !
The 40 cron/ rokkor is just so good, renders crisp, sharp , tres 1970’s signature,
never lets You down, a tiny compact workhorse

Thanks, Helen!

d.dulin: Thank you very much!

I did file the flange on mine down to bring up the 35 framelines on the M2. I think of 40mm as a slightly tighter 35mm lens and shoot it that way. BTW, 40 and 75 make a fine travel kit.
 
Back
Top Bottom