ali_baba
Well-known
so i shoot alot of music, so i was thinking of the summilux 75 1.4.
i've been encouraged to go for the 75,2 APO instead.
anyone care to comment on the differences of these lenses, possibly some sample photos?
from what i understand the 75,2 APO is a superior optical formula, which is why it is still in production and the 1.4 is not.
insight please!
i've been offered to use a 75,1.4 from whom i may buy it from so i guess ill figure it out if i like that soon enough.
i've been encouraged to go for the 75,2 APO instead.
anyone care to comment on the differences of these lenses, possibly some sample photos?
from what i understand the 75,2 APO is a superior optical formula, which is why it is still in production and the 1.4 is not.
insight please!
i've been offered to use a 75,1.4 from whom i may buy it from so i guess ill figure it out if i like that soon enough.
Last edited by a moderator:
Hacker
黑客
APO ASPH is like 50mm Summilux ASPH. 75 Lux has very nice bokeh and very suitable for portraits (and good for other types of shots). I will definitely buy the Lux 75 as it is becoming harder to acquire one. It can always be sold quite easily. The 75 AA is current, and you can always find one quite easily, new or used.
Hacker
黑客
It is also 1 stop faster in you intend to shoot bands indoors.
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
I would not call either lens a superior formula, they are different beasts altogether. The drawing of the Summilux wide open is incomparable. It is an older gen.lens, with a slightly softer rendering wide open. The reason it was discontinued was that the glass used was no longer available at acceptable prices and that the costs of production were no longer in balance with the small number sold. I would say the slightly lower contrast compared to the 75 apo would make it more suitable for stage work. It is a difficult lens to focus,though.
mfunnell
Shaken, so blurred
Rayt
Nonplayer Character
from what i understand the 75,2 APO is a superior optical formula, which is why it is still in production and the 1.4 is not.
insight please!
i've been offered to use a 75,1.4 from whom i may buy it from so i guess ill figure it out if i like that soon enough.
The 75/1.4 and the Noctilux shared glass types that are no longer available so both are discontinued. The 75mm Summilux has a very unique look kind of like a long Noctilux but without the bad vignetting and swirling background some people don't like.
Never Satisfied
Well-known
I've got the 1st version of the 75mm Summilux (with the Noctilux hood) on loan and if the owner would part with it I'd buy it in a heart beat. It is brilliant, up close and wide open it is a great portrait lens; the 75mm Summicron does get a great rap though but you loose a stop.
MCTuomey
Veteran
i've been fortunate to have owned both at different times, still have the 75/2. if i were shooting bands i would take the 75/1.4. as jaap says, it will probably help you with the contrast extremes of stage lighting. you will also like the extra stop. both lenses are wonderful instruments, that's clear. choosing between them is a nice problem to have.
Ronald M
Veteran
The Lux gets sharp at 2.5 and it outstanding. Wide open a bit soft , but makes a beautiful image. I had mine on the camera one time and I thought it was my 90 pre-ASPH. I could not believe the negs when I saw them. In fact I thought the camera was broken as the M3 kept bringing up the 50mm lines.
The APO is sharp at 2.0, if sharp is what you are after at wide apertures,this is the lens. It is sharp without being harsh like the early APO glass. Hard to explain.
I never miss focus with mine. Get the CV 75 BL finder. You will not regret it. It is just like the Leica 50 BL with slightly different construction.
The APO is sharp at 2.0, if sharp is what you are after at wide apertures,this is the lens. It is sharp without being harsh like the early APO glass. Hard to explain.
I never miss focus with mine. Get the CV 75 BL finder. You will not regret it. It is just like the Leica 50 BL with slightly different construction.
ali_baba
Well-known
does anyone have both?
mind taking some photos @ f2, 2.5 etc?
or know of any comparison sights?
personally im drawn to faster lenses.
thanks
mind taking some photos @ f2, 2.5 etc?
or know of any comparison sights?
personally im drawn to faster lenses.
thanks
ali_baba
Well-known
i have a 90 that when its on the m8 is a bit much, and quite a bit slow.
cmogi10
Bodhisattva
Mmm...Summilux
Gets sharp too..
Love this lens...

Gets sharp too..

Love this lens...

MikeL
Go Fish
cmogi10
Bodhisattva
I love seeing 75 lux shots, thanks for sharing Mike!
ali_baba
Well-known
i don't know why i'm torn here.
image results speak for themselves.
hmm.
any 75 APO wide open (@2) shots to be had?
image results speak for themselves.
hmm.
any 75 APO wide open (@2) shots to be had?
Rafael
Mandlerian
I love seeing 75 lux shots, thanks for sharing Mike!
Agreed! Mike, that photograph is stunning. And Carl, you're putting your 'lux to some pretty great use as well. I love what this lens can do. It really is a special one.
cmogi10
Bodhisattva
Thanks Marc!
Here's one from the other day...
Here's one from the other day...

Richard Marks
Rexel
Well I do not think there are too many people who own both lenses you mention. I love the f1.4 stop but you pay for this in terms of weight. The M8 75 lux feels a bit more like an SLR in dimensions. By f2.8 is very sharp and as sharp as it gets by f 5.6. My only worry with this lens is that if anything happens to the glass it is probably irreplaceable.
Attached three shots at f1.4
[/ATTACH][/ATTACH]
Best wishes
Richard
Attached three shots at f1.4
[/ATTACH][/ATTACH]
Best wishes
Richard
Attachments
MikeL
Go Fish
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
I doubt that. Leica usually keeps plenty of spares.Well I do not think there are too many people who own both lenses you mention. I love the f1.4 stop but you pay for this in terms of weight. The M8 75 lux feels a bit more like an SLR in dimensions. By f2.8 is very sharp and as sharp as it gets by f 5.6. My only worry with this lens is that if anything happens to the glass it is probably irreplaceable.
Attached three shots at f1.4
[/ATTACH][/ATTACH]
Best wishes
Richard
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.