Out to Lunch
Veteran
What did I miss about this brand new digital rangefinder camera with a 1.1/35mm lens?
What did I miss about this brand new digital rangefinder camera with a 1.1/35mm lens?
I read it would be available in Europe this year and outside Europe next year...but is it true...only released to the Russian market with the menus in Cryllic which is a shame as it would have gone down well in the UK as KMZ products were heavily imported here back in their heyday before the fall of the USSR.
Interestingly weird... Why sink money into this without a market? Prestige...oligarch arrogance...a mix of both?
It is made in very limited numbers, so it is hardly worth lusting after.
Wouldn't its limited availability make it even more lust-worthy?
Wouldn't its limited availability make it even more lust-worthy?
Not talking about this Zeica specifically, but is any digital camera collectible?
You can take a 25, 50, 100 year old film camera and it still works. But will a 50 yr old digital camera just be a fancy paperweight?
Fifty years from now SoCal eco police will execute you on the spot for owning functioning film camera. It is going to be worse than already banned and eliminated guns. Because it will be device triggering unauthorized water use and animals abuse, which were considered as highest crime under Chelsea Clinton SoCal progressive governor.
While beard and mustache guys in Silicon Valley eco shoppes will convert any digital or film camera to solar operating device with 3D printed sensor and electronics. Because it is SoCal after all.
And of course Russian will still make M240 cameras after getting entire Wetzlar factory to Putinograd (ex St. Peterburg).
It depends if you want it to collect or if you want it to use as an everyday camera.
It is not a cheap camera to buy in the first place (5500 euros) and we are now approaching the halcyon days of FF mirrorless cameras with many new models to show up by different manufacturers in the very near future.
As the "cost versus usability ratio", it is not a good deal even if you manage to get hold of one as a kit in an era where a Sony A7II with kit lens can be bought new.. sometimes for a low price, as under a grand USD in the USA.
By that logic, why buy a digital Leica M? The Typ 240 is about the same price without offering a stupidly-fast 35mm, and is positively common in comparison.
At least some effort went into making this camera different from its source body, unlike something like Hasselblad's FX-format piss-takes.