The Mandler 35mm f2

[rfaspen]

Hmm. Just checked the Mandler shop site. Only brass silver lenses left...at $538USD. Is that a price increase? The sold out black aluminium still shows $348, but maybe that will be changed when they get back in stock? Don't need this lens, but it seemed like such a deal I shouldn't pass up.

 

[Deklari]

Hmm. Just checked the Mandler shop site. Only brass silver lenses left...at $538USD. Is that a price increase? The sold out black aluminium still shows $348, but maybe that will be changed when they get back in stock? Don't need this lens, but it seemed like such a deal I shouldn't pass up.

So far no price increase: for M-mount black aluminum $348, silver aluminium $378, brass $538, LTM version +$40

 

[boojum]

I got the Mandler with the intention to replace my other "character" 35mm lens - Canon 35 LTM. I like everything about this lens (very good center sharpness even wide open, swirl, size) except the 40mm filter size and particularly 1m MFD. At 300 EUR (ok, probably closer to 400 after VAT and import fees) I couldn't resist the Mandler 35. And it was available in black (which I prefer) when I visited their shop, so I took that as a sign... 😉

You will no doubt continue to have trouble with the filter size. I solved that on mine by using the 39mm specified for the lens, Give it a try. ;o)

 

[Archiver]

I got the Mandler with the intention to replace my other "character" 35mm lens - Canon 35 LTM. I like everything about this lens (very good center sharpness even wide open, swirl, size) except the 40mm filter size and particularly 1m MFD. At 300 EUR (ok, probably closer to 400 after VAT and import fees) I couldn't resist the Mandler 35. And it was available in black (which I prefer) when I visited their shop, so I took that as a sign... 😉

But the Mandler uses a 39mm filter and has a 70cm minimum focus distance?

 

[Bingley]

But the Mandler uses a 39mm filter and has a 70cm minimum focus distance?

I think brbo’s post was a little confusing re: the Canon 35mm f2.0 LTM or the new Mandler 35mm f2.0. The 40mm filters that the Canon lens was designed for are indeed hard to come by, whereas the Mandler uses standard 39mm filters that are widely available. My workaround for filters for my Canon lenses has been to get a 40 to 43mm step-up ring and then use 43mm filters on those Canon lenses. Brbo’s larger point, about the Mandler replacing (or, maybe, augmenting) the Canon as a “character” lens is a good one, IMO.

 

[Bingley]

It would appear that Mandler was unprepared for the demand its copy of the KoB lens generated at its price point, and production is slowly catching up to demand. I will say that the company has been pretty responsive and good to deal with. I purchased the premium accessory kit and received a rear lens cap instead of the square lens hood. I brought this to Mandler’s attention and they apologized for the glitch and promptly shipped out the square hood. My black aluminum version of the lens is now sporting the square lens hood and the UV filter that also came with the accessory kit. It’s been great to be able to use the lens on both my IIIc and my CL digital with the M-mount adapter.

 

[Archiver]

I think brbo’s post was a little confusing re: the Canon 35mm f2.0 LTM or the new Mandler 35mm f2.0. The 40mm filters that the Canon lens was designed for are indeed hard to come by, whereas the Mandler uses standard 39mm filters that are widely available. My workaround for filters for my Canon lenses has been to get a 40 to 43mm step-up ring and then use 43mm filters on those Canon lenses. Brbo’s larger point, about the Mandler replacing (or, maybe, augmenting) the Canon as a “character” lens is a good one, IMO.

Ahhh, I can see where I misinterpreted @brbo 's post. Sorry about that. @brbo