back alley
IMAGES
the more i'm thinking that i don't really need a pro-x1 but i might want an x100 again!!
first, i have no interest in possible zoom lenses..little interest in the 28 and none in the 60...that leaves the 35 (50 fov) which would be my second choice behind a 35mm (23 for the fujis).
currently there is no 23 for the pro-x...
my interest in a change has more to do with wanting an af camera that resembles a rangefinder...both fujis do that!
my rd1s do what i like now...keeping the 21/40 combo is a definite...
the d90 and lenses do all sorts of things that i am liking (for the change).
so, save my money (or sell a couple of lenses) for a used x100 ...could be a plan!!
first, i have no interest in possible zoom lenses..little interest in the 28 and none in the 60...that leaves the 35 (50 fov) which would be my second choice behind a 35mm (23 for the fujis).
currently there is no 23 for the pro-x...
my interest in a change has more to do with wanting an af camera that resembles a rangefinder...both fujis do that!
my rd1s do what i like now...keeping the 21/40 combo is a definite...
the d90 and lenses do all sorts of things that i am liking (for the change).
so, save my money (or sell a couple of lenses) for a used x100 ...could be a plan!!
segedi
RFicianado
OK, so the x100 looks like a rangefinder and covers an angle of view you like. But it appears you already got rid of it once. Why did you dump it and what's the real attraction?
Looks like you have some kits that are doing what you want now. Save your money and well, save your money
Looks like you have some kits that are doing what you want now. Save your money and well, save your money
greyelm
Malcolm
I feel the same, my X100 has a lens that is suitable for most of my shots, the latest firmware (in my opinion) makes it much more snappy and I have my GF1 with 20mm & 45-200mm when needed. This doesn't mean I won't succumb to GAS later on but for now I am OK.
bgb
Well-known
I think your problem might be solved with less thinking and more going out and taking photos.
I have the same problem and find when i forget about the equipment i find all i need is one camera that i trust.
YMMV of course
I have the same problem and find when i forget about the equipment i find all i need is one camera that i trust.
YMMV of course
back alley
IMAGES
I think your problem might be solved with less thinking and more going out and taking photos.
I have the same problem and find when i forget about the equipment i find all i need is one camera that i trust.
YMMV of course
i have heard this so many times before...but the flaw in the thinking is that i do go out and shoot. i bet i post more images than most folks on rff on a regular basis.
back alley
IMAGES
OK, so the x100 looks like a rangefinder and covers an angle of view you like. But it appears you already got rid of it once. Why did you dump it and what's the real attraction?
Looks like you have some kits that are doing what you want now. Save your money and well, save your money
i traded it for another rd1 body as i had sold an rd1 body to get the x100...i know, twilight zone...i just like have 2 rd1 bodies.
as for the x100, i liked it...a lot! i loved the iso 3200 images...my biggest problem is lack of cash.
Archlich
Well-known
Given the reports that started circulating in the past weeks, the X-Pro1 offers limited AF improvements on the X100, which is a little disappointing.
The X100's monstrous sync speed is definitely worth looking into.
The X100's monstrous sync speed is definitely worth looking into.
chris00nj
Young Luddite
If a 35mm focal length was my preferred choice, I'd go for the X100 as well, but alas I prefer a 50
print44
Well-known
Why did you get rid of the x100 in the first place?
segedi
RFicianado
We photogs are a weird bunch. It appears GAS is the gateway drug to RAS (ReAquisition Syndrome). I sold a Mamiya 7II a year or so ago and thanks to this fine forum and its fine members, bought one back!
back alley
IMAGES
OK, so the x100 looks like a rangefinder and covers an angle of view you like. But it appears you already got rid of it once. Why did you dump it and what's the real attraction?
Looks like you have some kits that are doing what you want now. Save your money and well, save your money
i got rid of it because i wanted a second rd1 body again...i like using 2 of my favourite camera.
i also thought i would pick up a second hand x100 again sometime in the future or perhaps the new fuji...
the x-pro looks like a great machine but when i think about it i don't really want the other lenses and i don't want to give up my 40 sonnar...maybe when the day comes that i can't manually focus i'll be forced to an all af cadre of gear.
dreilly
Chillin' in Geneva
I'm with you the X100. I just got one to try it and I'm REALLY enjoying it. I don't like that it's occasionally a little wiggy and often obtuse, but I very much dig the OVF--and the great jpegs that come out of, like the Epson or Olympus JPEGs. Like the R-D1, it's really a fun camera.
But I think if you can hold off prices for the X100 will go even lower. Once the X-1 pro starts shipping out, there will be people dumping their X100s. The ones for sale now are likely the early adopters who need to sell their X100s at the best price to afford the X-1 Pro.
I've thought about the X-1 pro but the price is too high for just a body, and I don't see it as a good platform for Leica M lenses in terms of focusing--I mean, might as well just shoot with a Nex or Ricoh GXR if you can't use the OVF. My current plan is to get back into Micro-4/3. I'm not crazy about the looks of the EM-5, but the 16mp sensor and the weather proof thing (and the built in EVF and stabilization) has my interest piqued. I'll have that and the Summilux DG for my fast 50 and the X100 for my 35 with best possible high ISO performance, and then for a while just the kit zoom and maybe one of the superwides for fun.
I don't to want to confuse or tempt you further, so I'll close with saying the x100 isn't a bad idea. Sometimes the second time is the charm. But think it through and go slow. The price will just keep getting lower.
doug
But I think if you can hold off prices for the X100 will go even lower. Once the X-1 pro starts shipping out, there will be people dumping their X100s. The ones for sale now are likely the early adopters who need to sell their X100s at the best price to afford the X-1 Pro.
I've thought about the X-1 pro but the price is too high for just a body, and I don't see it as a good platform for Leica M lenses in terms of focusing--I mean, might as well just shoot with a Nex or Ricoh GXR if you can't use the OVF. My current plan is to get back into Micro-4/3. I'm not crazy about the looks of the EM-5, but the 16mp sensor and the weather proof thing (and the built in EVF and stabilization) has my interest piqued. I'll have that and the Summilux DG for my fast 50 and the X100 for my 35 with best possible high ISO performance, and then for a while just the kit zoom and maybe one of the superwides for fun.
I don't to want to confuse or tempt you further, so I'll close with saying the x100 isn't a bad idea. Sometimes the second time is the charm. But think it through and go slow. The price will just keep getting lower.
doug
For the used prices they are going for now, it's an absolute bargain.
helen.HH
To Light & Love ...
+1...and the Prices will probably drop a tad more
Its a Fun Cam...with Gorgeous Rendering
Why Not ?
celluloidprop
Well-known
If I had another body/system with interchangeable lenses, I'd probably stick with the X100 and let the mirrorless cameras mature for another generation.
But I find myself wanting wide and 50 more often these days and though I'm tempted by the D800 I think I'm diving in to the XP1.
But I find myself wanting wide and 50 more often these days and though I'm tempted by the D800 I think I'm diving in to the XP1.
The other thing to realize is that the X100 is smaller and lighter with a smaller lens and also dead quiet. It's a great take anywhere camera... which, based on your current cameras, could be good to have. The XPro1 is significantly bigger.