Vince Lupo
Whatever
Iwould argue with the assumption that B&W images are "supposed" to look like anything in particular.
Absolutely right -- I sure hope the OP doesn't ever look at Bill Brandt's photos!
Iwould argue with the assumption that B&W images are "supposed" to look like anything in particular.
This picture's main issue is the horizon which is right in the middle and at the very center a tree, the image thus divided by four, a big no in any "art" because the viewers eye gets confused without any point of reference.
Just to annoy you I'll post some more of the "modern" B&W film garbage. Yes, I know the film is considered garbage and also it's hated by many people in the age of digital convenience. Thus I'm deeply sorry for the inconvenience by posting a simple film scan...
So there are rules for art? Hilarious.This picture's main issue is the horizon which is right in the middle and at the very center a tree, the image thus divided by four, a big no in any "art" because the viewers eye gets confused without any point of reference.
How did it come to this?
This picture's main issue is the horizon which is right in the middle and at the very center a tree, the image thus divided by four, a big no in any "art" because the viewers eye gets confused without any point of reference.
Enlighten us. Post examples.
Just to annoy you I'll post some more of the "modern" B&W film garbage. Yes, I know the film is considered garbage and also it's hated by many people in the age of digital convenience. Thus I'm deeply sorry for the inconvenience by posting a simple film scan...
Why B&W photography has lost its charm? I got into photography because I liked the B&W images of certain photographers. Now, even despite all these years, those photographers and their B&W images still look superior to me compared to anything out there today. Today there are two types of B&W images, flat and dull digital conversions and film scans, contrasty and overcooked digital conversions and film scans. How did it come to this?
Film is nice.. Digital is nice, but B&W conversion from Digital is not so nice, get yourself a M-Monochrom...
I just made some popcorn, want some?
It came to this because you are not visiting good galleries that show fresh works from guys like me who are not putzing around devaluing their 100% analog and wet print workflow by slathering it on Flickr. I just got done hanging a show called "Silver & Ice" of 10x10 prints and four are already spoken for at $750 a pop, read the statement under my screen name on the left, it works, trust me.....
Here is an iphone pic of one of the pieces in the matting, snowmelt water cutting through late Spring snowpack shot on 6x6 Techpan, printed on Ilford Warmtone Fiber...
It's out there sir, just go look!
I don't know if I could find a better example of trolling...
Convince yourself that good black & white still exists, OP. It's not our job.
Most people are completely oblivious how bad their work is, until you tell them and then it ruins their day.