The New Standard? Voigtlander 50mm f/1.2 Nokton II on M11 and Nikon Zf

MP Guy

Just another face in the crowd
Staff member
Local time
10:57 PM
Joined
Jul 28, 2003
Messages
2,793
Location
PNW
I’ve spent some time recently with the new Voigtlander 50mm f/1.2 Nokton II, and I wanted to share some thoughts with the RFF crowd specifically on how it balances that "clinical" bite with the soul we expect from fast M mount glass.


I’ll admit, I was a bit leery at first. I’m usually an APO Lanthar shooter, and I wasn’t sure if the Nokton II would satisfy my craving for surgical sharpness. However, after shooting it natively on the Leica M11 and adapting it to the Nikon Zf via the Techart Pro, I’m genuinely impressed.


A few quick takeaways from my review:


Sharpness
: At f/1.4 and f/2, it comes startlingly close to the APO standard. The contrast on textures like fur and eyelashes is biting.

Rendering: The 12 blade diaphragm is a highlight. The "sawtooth" bokeh at f/1.4 gives way to incredibly smooth, circular orbs by f/2.

The Manual Experience: Using this natively on the M11 is a joy. The build is compact (even lighter than the v1), and the focus throw is perfectly dampened for rangefinder use.

Versatility: Shooting it on the Zf gave me the best of both worlds. AF convenience when I needed it, but with that unmistakable Voigtlander drawing style.

I've put together a full write up with several high res samples (color and B&W) showing everything from f/1.2 to stopped down.


You can see the full set of images and the technical breakdown here:





Curious to hear if anyone else has made the jump from the original v1 or the APO to this new Nokton!
 
Excellent detailed review thank you J. It's a lens I have often considered and your analysis and images pretty much seal the decision. And consider me Monochrom trolled ;-)
 
Nice review that hasn’t gotten the attention it deserves it seems. Probably because it was posted so close to christmas. The lens is intriguing, although I am quite happy with my Nokton 50 1.5 ii. Not sure if I would reap the benefits of an upgrade since I shoot film mostly.
 
I have the previous version of this lens. I'm slightly peeved that a newer version has been released so soon. Anyway, I haven't seen any comments about the comparison of the two versions. It might not make much difference to me since I use film, hand held, but it would still be interesting to know.
 
I have the previous version of this lens. I'm slightly peeved that a newer version has been released so soon. Anyway, I haven't seen any comments about the comparison of the two versions. It might not make much difference to me since I use film, hand held, but it would still be interesting to know.
Optically, they are exactly the same. Just one has a chrome nose and one has a black nose

From what I've seen, the 40mm f/1.2 did get updated molds for the aspherical elements (so it shows a much more subtle onion ring pattern relative to the v1), but, the 50 v1 was already fine in that regard (so no further update was necessary).
 
Optically, they are exactly the same. Just one has a chrome nose and one has a black nose

From what I've seen, the 40mm f/1.2 did get updated molds for the aspherical elements (so it shows a much more subtle onion ring pattern relative to the v1), but, the 50 v1 was already fine in that regard (so no further update was necessary).
OK, thanks, now I can relax.
 
Looks an interesting lens. A little weird on the question of "what lens hood" to use with it ... LH-10, LH-14, or LH-15. All three are called out as appropriate for this lens, at prices from $120 to $150. I wish Voigtländer would simply package the right lens hood with the lens. It would be less costly to do it that way, add a reasonable baseline amount to the cost of the lens.

I don't know whether I'm in the market for yet another fast 50. I have four already. 🤷‍♂️

G
 
Back
Top Bottom