The OFFICIAL Plustek 120 post your scans

35mm

35mm

I am hoping to have some E6 to scan in a week or two!

Hexar AF
Expired Agfa APX 100
PLustek OP 120

8466540846_e96f0bf3eb_b.jpg
 
I note that the scanner uses LEDs as the light source. What is the diffusion for this? I had a Nikon Coolscan IV but the problem with it was the dreaded Callier effect, which results in all kinds of problems (exaggerated grain and scratches, for instance). Of course this only effects traditional monochrome scans but since 99% of my scanning involves b&w negatives it's important to me. Does the Plustek 120 suffer from the same issue? Or does it use something akin to the Coolscan 9000's 'rod dispersion' technique?
 
lawrence said:
I note that the scanner uses LEDs as the light source. What is the diffusion for this? I had a Nikon Coolscan IV but the problem with it was the dreaded Callier effect, which results in all kinds of problems (exaggerated grain and scratches, for instance). Of course this only effects traditional monochrome scans but since 99% of my scanning involves b&w negatives it's important to me. Does the Plustek 120 suffer from the same issue? Or does it use something akin to the Coolscan 9000's 'rod dispersion' technique?
Click to expand...

Nikon LS-5000 also uses LEDs and is well known for it's condenser enlarger look. It, however, aside from a few minor annoyances, never fails to deliver quality scans.

I find that thick (i.e. over-exposed) negs present the most difficulty for LED scanners.
 
Folks...

The silver8 uninstall-reinstall seems to have worked.

I really dislike that software, can't wait until Vuescan comes out.

thats said:

My Plustek 120 works great and i am most happy with the results!!!

I did some 120 Tmax scans all day yesterday, imported a few into Lightroom4, and printed some big prints on my Epson7900, and I am absolutely excited.

My digital darkroom is complete.

The days in the wet darkroom are awesome memories, but i am looking forward to including the P120 into my workflow!

I'll post my link to flickr very soon, have to publish some scans.
 
Hey there all.
I'm out of focus ;) but during the wait for assistance... here we go with some tests with a modified 6x12 holder and fluid mounted film.
There is a 100% crop in the set, both scans @5300dpi



photostream
 
Thanks for the tip...I'll have to check that out. Hopefully it fixes the some stability issues. 4 crashes in 12 scans over the weekend...

--Greg
 
gmikol said:
Thanks for the tip...I'll have to check that out. Hopefully it fixes the some stability issues. 4 crashes in 12 scans over the weekend...

--Greg
Click to expand...

for that, check to see how much memory you have allocated.

go through the service window.

default is something like 3042?

I allocated 8000 and have not crashed since.
 
Ebertoni said:
Hey there all.
I'm out of focus ;) but during the wait for assistance... here we go with some tests with a modified 6x12 holder and fluid mounted film.
There is a 100% crop in the set, both scans @5300dpi



photostream
Click to expand...

Care to enlighten us as to what was entailed in modifying the holders to permit wetmounting?
 
007

007

Another one from Sebring, as above.
(these were developed at my local lab, usually I sent stuff like this to be scanned and developed at places like NCPS)


8577309927_3e4b46c6fb_b.jpg
 
Hello folks.

Sorry for the delay in posting some scans from my Plustek 120!


I chose these two images to show edge detail and also tonal gradations.

IMHO, both scans are superb, and the high-res files are more than suitable for large format printing.

The original negatives are 6X6 full neg. The image of the adobe wall (taos) is tmax100. The image of the architectualr detail (portland) is konica infrared.

I wish you folks could see what I am seeing of these scans in lightroom 4.

they are absolutley amazing scans.

I am totally satisfied with my scanner!
 
Bautiful scans, beezil. The tonality and sharpness look fantastic. Good to see another person in addition to Fabio with excellent results.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom