Greyscale
Veteran
Auto-Takumar 35/3.5
Same lens as Colton's in Post #58, but not reversed.
Pentax 6x7, S-M-C Takumar 6x7 90mm f/2.8 LS, Kodak 400TX, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 6 minutes.
2018.07.07 Roll #172-02790-Pano-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr

Ahem... there are some Takumar lenses for sale in Classifieds right now, if anyone's interested... Just sayin'...;-)
I'd have nabbed the SPII and M42 lenses, Steve -- been lusting for the 8-element 50/1.4 for a long while
Just do it, Paula would be fine with it.
... (and from a reputable seller).
Edit: Paula can sigh with relief... the Spotmatic kit is sold.
2. I'm not so sure about the "reputable" part -- definitely the seller has a "reputation", but what kind of reputation, that's the real question! 😉 :angel:
Great portrait.
I sold my 90/2.8 years ago after getting the newer and smaller Pentax 67 90/2.8, but for a long time the 90/2.8 LS was my main lens for my 67. I kinda wish I still had it.
Agree. I know I have my thoughts on said reputation...😉
I can’t say enough good things about my 105mm Pentax 67. I can’t think of a lens that delivers more for so little money. Just Super.



A new addition to my Takumars, a wonderful Auto-Takumar 105/2.8.
Morning blend. by Mike Novak, on Flickr
And the first shot that I have made with this lens.
Auto-Takumar 105/2.8 test shot. by Mike Novak, on Flickr
The Auto Takumars definitely have something - Apart from looking good as pieces of equipment it is the rendering. I think it may be that the longer Takumars tend to be Sonnar designs and hence have that lovely rendering that this optical design is renowned for. I think I prefer them to the later versions of the lenses. However in relation to both the 105mm and the 135mm Takumar lenses I tend to have these in several versions where these were made - auto Takumar, early 46mm filter preset, later 49mm preset, Super Multi Coated Takumar (auto diaphragm) and SMC Takumar. Does that make me obsessed? Or just obsessive?