RayPA
Ignore It (It'll go away)
is this real bokeh? it almost looks like PS blur tool. so soft!!
Epimetheus said:Since my rangefinder lenses aren’t very good with bokeh, here are couple
with my all time favorite Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm F2.8 on a Kiev 60.
ampguy
Veteran
Please mention if you are using filters. Not sure if it has much effect, but I'm seeing stuff here that I don't think should be seen with "proper" lens usage...
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
maddoc
... likes film again.
M3 / Summilux 50mm pre-ASPH (@ f/1.4) Tri-X:

sienarot
Well-known
Lotari said:pentax *ist d and helios-40 85/1.5
Heh heh heh, I was wondering whtn the Helios 85/1.5 would make an appearance in this thread
Epimetheus
Well-known
It's real. Only slight curves adjustement made in PS. It's a great lens.RayPA said:is this real bokeh? it almost looks like PS blur tool. so soft!!
Nemo
Established
M8 + Noctilux:

Last edited:
venchka
Veteran
GRRRRRRRRRRRRR! Roland, I don't get it. I've used the same lens and the same film. I get Pooh-Pooh and you get caviar. Not fair!
owenreading
Established
A few photos from recent scannings that display some nice bokeh, all from a Canonet G-III QL17, most likely @ f/1.7 or very close.
At the fireworks, HP5@800
Magdalen College playing fields, Oxford, HP5@800
Christ Church Meadow, Oxford, Jessops Pan 100 (which I believe is Ilford made).
At the fireworks, HP5@800
Magdalen College playing fields, Oxford, HP5@800
Christ Church Meadow, Oxford, Jessops Pan 100 (which I believe is Ilford made).
Attachments
Mackinaw
Think Different
Mamiya C220 w/Mamiya 135mm F4.5. TMax 400 in Xtol.

foto_fool
Well-known
Nikkor 50/1.4 @ f2.0 on Leica IIIf, APX 400 in Ilfotec DD-X
Bokeh is better without highlights.
- John

Bokeh is better without highlights.
- John
SteveM(PA)
Poser
Thanks Erik...wish I could say I took them. 
Really like what that Canon 0.95 can do...
Really like what that Canon 0.95 can do...
ErikFive said:Those Kodachrome shots are really nice Robert.
peterm1
Veteran
This is rather odd bokeh. A boring shot (a bus shelter - spare me!) but it was only taken to test the sharpness of a 40 year old 300 mm Takumar. Sharpness is OK and no chromatic aberation but rather odd, slightly harsh, bokeh.

Peter in Cairns Qld
Newbie
Great Photo!, Just love the translucent, "radioactive" colours against the Bokeh.\Kind regardsshadowfox said:Good or bad, here it comes:
![]()
Peter
Marc-A.
I Shoot Film
raid
Dad Photographer
I also agree with Marc and Gabriel on the impact. This is a great bokeh photo.
S
StuartR
Guest
I love the combination of sharp and soft that you can get with the bokeh of larger formats. This is the 110/2 planar...I love the look of it:
Or the 35/1.4 ASPH which is superb...
(that last photo is a joke by the way...he was trying to look...well...challenged.
The 75 lux which is probably the best of all, along with the 110...
And your regular 80mm planar:


Or the 35/1.4 ASPH which is superb...


(that last photo is a joke by the way...he was trying to look...well...challenged.
The 75 lux which is probably the best of all, along with the 110...

And your regular 80mm planar:


S
StuartR
Guest
I don't want to quote all your images, but I just want to say that I think your photography is fantastic. Both here and on flickr...Lotari said:![]()
homemade camera and fujinon-tv 110/0.95
venchka
Veteran
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.