mikebell48
Newbie
I would say there's not really a technical reason to shoot digital either. A good photograph is a good photograph whichever way it was shot. My own preference for film is that I don't like cameras that look like molten blobs of whatever they are made from and I like to have a physical archive of negatives. if camera technology became of overriding importance then decades of photogrphs once regarded as great would have to be asigned to the bin. A ludicrous idea.
__--
Well-known
Confessing that I haven't read the full three pages of this thread, this comment looks like a non sequitor if there ever was one. Also, there is no reason for technology to become of overriding importance, unless one lives in a places where it is impractical to get the materials necessary for film photography.
—Mitch/Bangkok
Bangkok Hysteria (download link for book project)
mikebell48
Newbie
Mailand,
The comment was clearly qualified. It is obviously not my own opinion and it was within the context of the original question raised in the thread.
The comment was clearly qualified. It is obviously not my own opinion and it was within the context of the original question raised in the thread.