kevin m
Veteran
So a refurbished Mac Pro and a 22" NEC monitor with calibrator can be had for less than an iMac. Man, am I glad I started this thread... 😀
MAC is a waste of money. Don't pay two or three times as much for the same hardware.
This picture explains everything
I'm shopping for a new computer and I'm looking at the new iMacs. It seems they can be configured with more than enough power for my needs, the most demanding of which would be Photoshop and my first foray into video editing with Final Cut Express. I'm leaning towards the 27" with the Quad-Core i5 processor, but since once you buy an iMac you're pretty much stuck with the hardware it comes with (outside of RAM) I'm wondering if the i7 processor and/or the SSD would be a worthwhile upgrade, or just overkill for my needs?
Thanks in advance and feel free to share any other tips. 🙂
What you are paying for in a Mac is not the hardware. It's the design and the software and the consistency. If that works for you, it is well worth the money.
MAC is a waste of money. Don't pay two or three times as much for the same hardware.
You must be talking about the first generation G5 Mac Mini. Or there is something wrong with your confirmation.
I thank you for all the tips and advice. 🙂
I just placed an order with B&H for a 2.66GHz Quad-Core Mac Pro, and a 22" NEC monitor with built-in calibrator for $500 less than the 27" iMac I was considering. I'm kinda stoked...! 😀
I thank you for all the tips and advice. 🙂
I just placed an order with B&H for a 2.66GHz Quad-Core Mac Pro, and a 22" NEC monitor with built-in calibrator for $500 less than the 27" iMac I was considering. I'm kinda stoked...! 😀
I thank you for all the tips and advice. 🙂
I just placed an order with B&H for a 2.66GHz Quad-Core Mac Pro, and a 22" NEC monitor with built-in calibrator for $500 less than the 27" iMac I was considering. I'm kinda stoked...! 😀
I was wondering how you got it for less than the iMac until I realized you didn't buy the current model. Great savings.
For heavy users, I still believe firmly that the Mac Pro is a better buy over the long haul than an iMac (if you can afford it).
Two hard drives is not really an option.
I think the Mac Pro is unquestionably the best high end graphics station on the market -- and in its basic form an incredible bargain at $2,499. Nothing else even comes close.
If Apple offered two hard drives in the iMac, I would have happily done that. But the fact that one is forced to buy the 27" screen (which I really didn't want, lovely as it is) just to have the option of a second drive and THEN pay so handsomely for that is what led me to explore other options.
I've had plenty of Apple warranty repairs, as well as outright failures to power supplies, video and logic boards, etc. All that stuff is made in the same factories as other major computer brands. I think Apple has always been in the top three quality-wise, in spite of the overall decline in the quality of components industry-wide.
What I like about Apple hardware is that it is well designed and ergonomic, more often than any other manufacturer. There are less seams, less gaps, less cheap plastic cracking and falling off. Noise and radiation are usually less. The laptop hinges and latches are better. The power cable is better... lots of little touches like that.
In the end, it just plain looks better. We're visual artists who spend a lot of our lives using these boxes, that should count for something.
I post-process just fine on my netbook w/ the touchpad (ie no mouse) that has a 10" screen, 1gb ram, and 1.6 ghz.
Any iMac will be good 🙂