texchappy
Well-known
This is the question. If it were Canon would it smell as sweet.
Now that Shakespeare is rolling over in his grave, to the question about. Really it's which of my two systems to cover that range with. I have an X Pro 1 and the three original lenses plus the 18-55. I also bought a Canon T4i, 40mm STM, and 18-135 STM with the thought of using it for video and eventually getting lenses for wildlife.
I had resigned myself to just using my X Pro 1 for for 60mm and lower and the photography in that range. However, I have a problem - the shots I've seen with the XF 55-200 are superb and sharp. I'm still worried about the AF on the 55-200 working for wildlife.
So, what are the for and against factors to getting the 55-200 in the Fuji mount as opposed to getting one of the four 70-200's or 55-300 STM?
TIA,
Tony
Now that Shakespeare is rolling over in his grave, to the question about. Really it's which of my two systems to cover that range with. I have an X Pro 1 and the three original lenses plus the 18-55. I also bought a Canon T4i, 40mm STM, and 18-135 STM with the thought of using it for video and eventually getting lenses for wildlife.
I had resigned myself to just using my X Pro 1 for for 60mm and lower and the photography in that range. However, I have a problem - the shots I've seen with the XF 55-200 are superb and sharp. I'm still worried about the AF on the 55-200 working for wildlife.
So, what are the for and against factors to getting the 55-200 in the Fuji mount as opposed to getting one of the four 70-200's or 55-300 STM?
TIA,
Tony


