Try again, which is your favourite slide / film?

Try again, which is your favourite slide / film?

  • Velvia 50

    Votes: 100 22.3%
  • Provia 100F

    Votes: 75 16.7%
  • Kodak E100VS

    Votes: 33 7.4%
  • Fuji Astia

    Votes: 49 10.9%
  • Kodak E100G

    Votes: 27 6.0%
  • Kodak Portra

    Votes: 60 13.4%
  • Fuji PRO

    Votes: 29 6.5%
  • Tmax

    Votes: 38 8.5%
  • TriX

    Votes: 120 26.8%
  • BW400 / XP2

    Votes: 44 9.8%
  • HP5 / FP4

    Votes: 75 16.7%
  • Others

    Votes: 92 20.5%

  • Total voters
    448
For some reason I have excellent FP4+ negs from the days when I did not do my own processing yet. Getting to grips with it myself seems to become a bit of a challenge.

Bog standard Fuji Superia in 200-400-800 for most color, some Sensia too, but slides slow me down when shooting my M2. Neopan 1600 is nice for high contrast work in Diafine.

But the film I have been most impressed with so far is Tri-X. It's hard to believe that something from 1954 can be so devastatingly good. You have to understand that I don't have a wet darkroom (yet), but it scans so well and works so brilliantly together with Diafine that I vote that for my favourite film.
 
+1

though I also voted for TX and TMX/Y since I use them in MF... though if the prolab was closer I'd probably just shoot BW400CN for MF as well.

BW400CN is the only reason I'm still shooting film.

The day I can make my B&W digital files look that good is the day I quit buying film.
 
Modern lenses have such inherent high contrast that I really really prefer to use a less intense colour film like Astia.

As for B&W, I recently bought 10 rolls of Plus-X and wow, was it refreshing to again use just a nice straight-forward traditional medium-grain film. These days I usually have to use a lab to develop B&W. I use A&I in Santa Monica. They develop with D-76. Thank goodness. Lots of other places use T-Max for all B&W films, regardless of the results. Results can be awful. Recent development of Plus-X at A&I worked out very very well. As with colour, they also offer a wide range of scans that are done while the film is developed.
 
I've been an avid Fuji Pro 400H man for quite a few years now.

Just found and bought a 5-pack of Kodak Portra 400NC.

Woah.

The colour-handling blows even 400H, an absolutely amazing film, into the weeds. I'm trying to track down some 160NC here in Israel to try, even though I cannot imagine it topping 400NC.

Well done Kodak... seems you're still in the game after all...
 
i love velvia 50 but so hard to get around here unless i order 20 rolls at a time.
i want to vote kodachrome. i use it about 80% of the time
 
The past year I used tri-x, plus-x, pan-f, velvia 50, hp-5, acros 100, kodachrome 64, efke 25, and a bunch of others. They are all available in heaven.
 
Other

Other

As far as color goes, Fuji Astia 100F for portraiture, because the skin tones are incredible. Kodachrome for everything else, though Velvia 50 is an acceptable stand in, darned good for landscapes.
 
Back
Top Bottom