ktmrider
Well-known
May sell the M9 and not get the M240. Have a mint 1958 M2 coming from Sherry to go with my 1959 M2.
...My other and favorite Leica is an M2 from 1959 and I have given thought to going back to film so honestly spending another $3000 seems a bit silly. I think it is just GAS which should pass quickly.
A 17% weight gain is significant.
You want the camera to lose weight, not gain it.
A 17% weight gain is significant.
You want the camera to lose weight, not gain it.
Let me know your thoughts. My other and favorite Leica is an M2 from 1959 and I have given thought to going back to film so honestly spending another $3000 seems a bit silly. I think it is just GAS which should pass quickly.
But it really depends on how you are getting on with your M9 and if you are feeling its limitations. $3000 is not exactly pocket change, unless you have money to spare.
Well, upgrade is off the table for the moment. I just got a mint 1958 M2 (to go with my 1959 M2) from Sherry. The M9 may pull some shelf time or I may sell it. Both digital and film have their place but I just like the film process better and the M2 is my favorite film M.

Have had a 35f1.2 for several years and yes it goes on the M9 more often then a film camera. However, I purchased a 35f2.8 CBiogon for hiking in Europe last fall and it lives on my M2.
I am thinking of going around the world with two M2's but the M9 does some things so well. I really do not want to mix film and digital but sometimes I think, why not.