I had the Skopar 35/2.5 in m mount and still have the Canon 35/2.0 LTM. They're both superb lenses. Although the Canon has a modern look, as one might expect, the images it produces seem a little rounder to my eyes, a little more 3D. Color images appear a tiny bit less saturated than color shots with the Skopar. The Skopar is very contrasty, with outstanding flare resistence (not that the Canon is flare prone -- its front element is recessed enough that I don't use a hood with it). Differences in handling come down to whether you prefer a tab (Skopar) or a knurled focusing ring (Canon). They're both lightweight lenses (the Canon has an aluminum body). I don't think you can go wrong with either lens. I'd make a choice between the two based on sample condition and price.
Sold this lens in M-mount a few years back and always kicked myself for it. Recently picked up a chrome LTM version for my Leica II, but I've been using it more often on my newly acquired M2. It's the best.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.