Dwayneb9584
Well-known
I love these shots!
I do like that first one, wolfpeterson! The light emphasizes the contours of the land, and the eye cannot help but follow the trails...
helen.HH
To Light & Love ...
helen.HH
To Light & Love ...
d__b
Well-known
CrisR
Well-known
M8 + 35/1.4
I really do wonder about these people that claim it's not a sharp lens, wide open?

Platform Sillettos by Cris Rose, on Flickr
I really do wonder about these people that claim it's not a sharp lens, wide open?

Platform Sillettos by Cris Rose, on Flickr
larmarv916
Well-known
I think your shots do the best job of displaying the performance of this lens a really excellent middle distance lens in particular. That is were is seems to shine.
Lss
Well-known
blue4130
Well-known
CrisR
Well-known

Late Night Coffee For One by Cris Rose, on Flickr
and some of that flare some people hate. I don't hate it.

Towards The BT Tower by Cris Rose, on Flickr
helen.HH
To Light & Love ...
maggieo
More Deadly
I think your shots do the best job of displaying the performance of this lens a really excellent middle distance lens in particular. That is were is seems to shine.
Thank you!
Here's a recent Nokton shot, this time with an M9-P:

Scooter, October 25, 2012 by Maggie Osterberg, on Flickr
d__b
Well-known
Very inspiring shots in this thread! Here's another one on HP5+

... by TheManWhoWasn'tThere, on Flickr

... by TheManWhoWasn'tThere, on Flickr
wilonstott
Wil O.
Here's four shots from my most recent roll. M4-P, New Portra 400.
The last shot illustrates the barreling out that drives some people crazy--doesn't really get me that bad.
First shot is either f/2 or f/1.7--It don't notice the lens going all glowy until I hit f/1.4 proper; in my experience, f/2 is generally safe in that regard.
Also, I tend to think the bokeh cleans up somewhat at f/2 as well; however, this may be based on circumstantial evidence.
The last shot illustrates the barreling out that drives some people crazy--doesn't really get me that bad.
First shot is either f/2 or f/1.7--It don't notice the lens going all glowy until I hit f/1.4 proper; in my experience, f/2 is generally safe in that regard.
Also, I tend to think the bokeh cleans up somewhat at f/2 as well; however, this may be based on circumstantial evidence.




ayazdani
Member
35/1.4 SC and Acros/Rodinal

The French Cottage by Aziz ., on Flickr

Middleburg Portrait by Aziz ., on Flickr

The French Cottage by Aziz ., on Flickr

Middleburg Portrait by Aziz ., on Flickr
Sylvester
Well-known
maggieo
More Deadly
Tom A
RFF Sponsor

Leica M2, Nokton 35mm f1.4 SC - at f1.4 and 1/60s. This is with Kodak Double X, rated at 400 iso and developed in Td 201 two bath developer. About a 30% crop from the full negative.
Kabouik
Member
Question to whom it may concern: do you all actually compose with the focus shift when you stop down from F/1.8 to F/5.6, or you never bother compensating it manually, and rather rely on the increased depth of field to have your subject in focus (or almost in focus)?
Brian Legge
Veteran
I haven't worried about focus shift. Its a 35mm lens so stopping it down gives me enough dof to ignore it.
Frankly, rangefinder calibration and imprecision on my part focusing due to parallax are more likely to be a source of problems shift with this lens.
Frankly, rangefinder calibration and imprecision on my part focusing due to parallax are more likely to be a source of problems shift with this lens.
Lss
Well-known
Only at close focus. At longer distances there is no practical problem.Question to whom it may concern: do you all actually compose with the focus shift when you stop down from F/1.8 to F/5.6, or you never bother compensating it manually, and rather rely on the increased depth of field to have your subject in focus (or almost in focus)?
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.