Voigtlander Ultron 40mm f2 for SLR - impressions sought and which version?

I had a 45 GN. Nice lens, focus is driven by a cam so focus feels sloppy. Plus they need sevice to get rid of the dried out grease. The close focus is not so close but they do stop down to 45. The 2.8 Pancake Ai-S is selling for more than a new Voigtlander.
 
Check Nikkor 45mm f2.8. It is classic, not overpriced pancake.

Simple Tessar design. Had one for a while. So small that it was really tough getting a grip on it to mount/dismount from the body. At f/2.8, nothing to write home about and doesn't improve until almost f/8. You have to be a serious Tessar junkie to love the lens. And for its limitations, the high cost ($300-400 US), is for the collector not the user.

The CV is a stop faster (more importantly, a very usable f/2), more complex and better corrected optic with an aspherical surface. I like the look of the CV SLI 40/2 with the domed hood. The newer SL II-S has a great look too, focuses even closer (0.25m) but is a bit larger. Wonderful retro-Nikon F look of the 1950's. The SL II is probably the least expensive and smallest of the lot. Came with close-up lenses.
 
Simple Tessar design. Had one for a while. So small that it was really tough getting a grip on it to mount/dismount from the body. At f/2.8, nothing to write home about and doesn't improve until almost f/8. You have to be a serious Tessar junkie to love the lens. And for its limitations, the high cost ($300-400 US), is for the collector not the user.

The CV is a stop faster (more importantly, a very usable f/2), more complex and better corrected optic with an aspherical surface. I like the look of the CV SLI 40/2 with the domed hood. The newer SL II-S has a great look too, focuses even closer (0.25m) but is a bit larger. Wonderful retro-Nikon F look of the 1950's. The SL II is probably the least expensive and smallest of the lot. Came with close-up lenses.


I'm talking about this lens:
http://www.jacksonhung.ca/blog/nippon-kogaku-gn-auto-nikkor-45mm-f28, not another overpriced one. 🙂
 
It's a cracking lens, light and compact, yet easy to use and great results. By coincidence just finished a roll in my Nikon FM2n armed with it. Tmax 400 in Tmax developer.

alley-1-of-1.jpg
 
Thanks, Charles. Thought I was done with Nikon after many years but had my eye on this FS which had been listed multiple times. The idea of a Nikkormat with no meter to die was appealing, so I made an offer. The 40 looks like it will be a good match.
 
Thanks, Charles. Thought I was done with Nikon after many years but had my eye on this FS which had been listed multiple times. The idea of a Nikkormat with no meter to die was appealing, so I made an offer. The 40 looks like it will be a good match.

1+

Remember that the 2nd version (in contrast the SLI or the current) is NOT compatible with the Nikkormat.
 
Thanks, Charles. Thought I was done with Nikon after many years but had my eye on this FS which had been listed multiple times. The idea of a Nikkormat with no meter to die was appealing, so I made an offer. The 40 looks like it will be a good match.

I'd been doing some test photos for an FM2n review I'm writing for my friendly local camera store with the 50mm f1.4, which I find a bit uninspiring. This really perked me up, super thing. Enjoy yours!
 
I'm talking about this lens:
http://www.jacksonhung.ca/blog/nippon-kogaku-gn-auto-nikkor-45mm-f28, not another overpriced one. 🙂

I have that, the 45 2.8 P, and the CV 40 f2.

The CV is by far the best, optically and mechanically. The 45 GN has a very uneven focus feel and mine has been rebuilt. It has a dead spot where it feels that nothing is happening as you turn the focus ring even though it is.
The P takes a while to get used to as it is too small.
At f8 they are all the same.
 
Mine came in the mail last week! Really lovely haptics - the focus ring feels perfectly damped and the knurling is grippy and comfortable. Only small quibble is that the aperture ring is not weighted as nicely (when compared to my Nikon ai-s lenses). Having only put one roll of film through it, I can't say too much other than that sharpness is nice (not exceptional....we are spoiled anymore). Contrast and flare resistance is high. Yes, it vignettes, has CA wide-open and exhibits visible onion rings, but the overall rendering is lovely and punchy. It has character and the size is tough to beat. Looking forward to using it more.

Jenny by Jim Fischer, on Flickr

Lisa by Jim Fischer, on Flickr

Jenny by Jim Fischer, on Flickr

Shoot by Jim Fischer, on Flickr

Jenny by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
 
I was fortunate to come across the latest version with the silver nose that focuses to 0.25m. What a fantastic lens! Looks like a vintage Nikkor and the very close focus and focal length offer so much flexibility. Great for film and great adapted to Fuji...

I got this version, too, early this year, and it now resides (maybe permanently) on my FM2n. It’s really really sharp and the .25m MFD is very nice to have.
 
Back
Top Bottom