brusby
Well-known
AgreedUnderstood, yes. No problem. The distance is the same, but there is a huge difference between the microlens array on the digital M cameras which are designed for lenses with short mount to focal plane distance and high angles of incidence, and the SL2S which is designed for telecentric lenses. That's what will drive that difference.
Marty
Zuiko-logist
Well-known
Could it be an incorrect lens profile on the Leica or in the editing software creating this, rather than some manual editing?
Freakscene
Obscure member
Possible, but the Leica won’t have a profile (there are only built in profiles for Leica lenses which may or may not suit), and there won’t be a software one available yet unless the user or C-V custom made one.Could it be an incorrect lens profile on the Leica or in the editing software creating this, rather than some manual editing?
Zuiko-logist
Well-known
Yes exactly, so if something was applied (accidentally?), then it may affect the rendering? All speculation - some real world users should be able to clarify. Somewhat concerning is that it seems to happen with other CV lenses.
sojournerphoto
Veteran
Only tangentially related, but do we know anything about the use of micro lenses on the M11, given the BSI sensor should mitigate some of the problems either earlier generations of camera?
It’s an interesting topic and, notably, Fuji adopted to use micro lenses giving a (much) lower than 100% fill factor for the 50 series of GFX cameras, then reverted to the modern norm of 100% for the 100 series.
Mike
It’s an interesting topic and, notably, Fuji adopted to use micro lenses giving a (much) lower than 100% fill factor for the 50 series of GFX cameras, then reverted to the modern norm of 100% for the 100 series.
Mike
Freakscene
Obscure member
I know they are there. The exact implementation or if they are different to other digital Ms, I’m not sure.Only tangentially related, but do we know anything about the use of micro lenses on the M11, given the BSI sensor should mitigate some of the problems either earlier generations of camera?
It’s an interesting topic and, notably, Fuji adopted to use micro lenses giving a (much) lower than 100% fill factor for the 50 series of GFX cameras, then reverted to the modern norm of 100% for the 100 series.
Mike
Trix400
Member
How does this new lens compare to the older 50mm f2.5 Color Skopar ?
sojournerphoto
Veteran
Thanks. They just don’t get discussed much these days!I know they are there. The exact implementation or if they are different to other digital Ms, I’m not sure.
Freakscene
Obscure member
Almost all digital cameras have microlenses; even on cameras designed for and with telecentric lenses, like most mirrorless cameras, they are used to maximise light entry to the sensor wells. Losing the microlenses is one reason I don’t like monochrome converted cameras as much as cameras with dedicated monochrome sensors. They are more important than the level of discussion would indicate.Thanks. They just don’t get discussed much these days!
Marty
anyone notice the update to the original post ?
more to follow
more to follow
Freakscene
Obscure member
Good one. I really hope that C-V can standardise on this as a look for their lens construction. As for the photos, we’ll have to wait.anyone notice the update to the original post ?
more to follow
When do you anticipate them being in stock Stephen? Also, is there a detent at 0.7m or does the lens just keep focusing?
Marty
helen.HH
To Light & Love ...
Love to listen to you fellows
the mix of Scientific & Intellectual banter...
Moi just wants to give it a
quick spin on a roll of Film & Digi
Then I'll know ~ 😜
the mix of Scientific & Intellectual banter...
Moi just wants to give it a
quick spin on a roll of Film & Digi
Then I'll know ~ 😜
brusby
Well-known
I really like the new look and styling of this lens, much more than the older type with the chrome ring on the front.
lukx
Well-known
The old 5cm ltm Nikkors were the gold standard for this, I never understood why their solution to this problem isn‘t adopted on any lens with extended focus range.Good one. I really hope that C-V can standardise on this as a look for their lens construction. As for the photos, we’ll have to wait.
When do you anticipate them being in stock Stephen? Also, is there a detent at 0.7m or does the lens just keep focusing?
Marty
sebastel
coarse art umbrascriptor
never expected this post to be turned into a marketing vehicle.anyone notice the update to the original post ?
more to follow
B-)
Evergreen States
Francine Pierre Saget (they/them)
Looking forward to what Erik's thoughts are, as he's been the biggest evangelist for the 50mm ƒ2.5 Color Skopar I've ever seen.How does this new lens compare to the older 50mm f2.5 Color Skopar ?
I am guessing July, price not yet set. No detent on the F2.2.Good one. I really hope that C-V can standardise on this as a look for their lens construction. As for the photos, we’ll have to wait.
When do you anticipate them being in stock Stephen? Also, is there a detent at 0.7m or does the lens just keep focusing?
Marty
More pics Voigtlander 50mm F2.2 Color Skopar Black: shop.CameraQuest.com
Availability and price not yet set. Black or Silver versions will be available.
Scenics show Point Mugu near Malibu, California -- taken on M11.
Stephen







Availability and price not yet set. Black or Silver versions will be available.
Scenics show Point Mugu near Malibu, California -- taken on M11.
Stephen







Last edited:
Evergreen States
Francine Pierre Saget (they/them)
Holy dust bunnies, Batman!
brusby
Well-known
Nice size and styling on that lens.
Do you recall what aperture (just roughly) was used for these shots?
That last image seems to be a 100% crop of the previous shot judging by the size and placement of the dust bunny. Not trying to be picky. Just to get a feel for how the lens is performing. p.s., never mind, just realized pics 2 and 4 are just enlargements of previous shots.
Do you recall what aperture (just roughly) was used for these shots?
That last image seems to be a 100% crop of the previous shot judging by the size and placement of the dust bunny. Not trying to be picky. Just to get a feel for how the lens is performing. p.s., never mind, just realized pics 2 and 4 are just enlargements of previous shots.
Last edited:
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.