rodt16s
Well-known
peterm1
Veteran
Uncle Fester
Well-known
Bob Michaels
nobody special
Retro-Grouch
Veteran
Erik van Straten
Veteran
rodt16s
Well-known
css9450
Veteran
Nikon F3AF, AF-Nikkor f2.8 "D", Fuji Acros I, Rodinal 1:50.

Wenge
Registered User
So far with these M lenses I either own (or recently rented) with UT Kolari mod A7r2 (w/notes)...*=winner
35/2 Summicron Canada v3: Very good when cropping to 645 in post, f/2 - f/9
best to crop to 645. corners at full 3:2 almost clear at f/9, f/11 good on tripod at base iso 100ish
35/2.8 Zeiss ZM: good corners at f/4 - f/11, good lens w/UT mod but not as sharp/good as Voigt 35/2 Asph Lanthar M mount
35/3.5 CV Color Skopar: iffy and ok for $300 lens, but would rather have v3 35mm Summicron if a choice. I think this would be
alot better on M film (same w/v3)
*15/4.5 CV Asph good at all f/4.5 - f/11, outstanding on A7r2 mod.
far better than Tri-Elmar at 16mm on Sony UT mod, while 21 no comparison to 21/2.8 Loxia on Sony non-mod
(Loxia 21/2.8 not good on UT mod, smeared edges/corners)
15/4.5 CV pre-Asph: not good, not recommended
25/2.8 Zeiss ZM: good at all from f/2.8, best at f/5.6 - f/8, exc on my A7r2 UT mod, makes me consider selling Q (but no won't do that)
35/4 CV Snapshot Skopar LTM: not good, not recommended on full-frame digital. (good on Sony Nex7 apsc)
90/4 Minolta/Rokkor: not recommended on full-frame digital. (Good on Sony Nex7 apsc)
rented Tri Elmar 16-18-21: not as good as CV 15 on Sony A7r2 UT mod, would never pay $4k to use on Sony (vs what others have said likely without using it), not great at 21 on Sony, but great lens on M10 at all apertures/focals 16 and 21 good on M10 and if I was keeping M10, would buy lens all day.
rented CV 35mm f/2 Lanthar: outstanding from f/5.6 to f/11 for landscape (f/16 not good)
35/2 Summicron Canada v3: Very good when cropping to 645 in post, f/2 - f/9
best to crop to 645. corners at full 3:2 almost clear at f/9, f/11 good on tripod at base iso 100ish
35/2.8 Zeiss ZM: good corners at f/4 - f/11, good lens w/UT mod but not as sharp/good as Voigt 35/2 Asph Lanthar M mount
35/3.5 CV Color Skopar: iffy and ok for $300 lens, but would rather have v3 35mm Summicron if a choice. I think this would be
alot better on M film (same w/v3)
*15/4.5 CV Asph good at all f/4.5 - f/11, outstanding on A7r2 mod.
far better than Tri-Elmar at 16mm on Sony UT mod, while 21 no comparison to 21/2.8 Loxia on Sony non-mod
(Loxia 21/2.8 not good on UT mod, smeared edges/corners)
15/4.5 CV pre-Asph: not good, not recommended
25/2.8 Zeiss ZM: good at all from f/2.8, best at f/5.6 - f/8, exc on my A7r2 UT mod, makes me consider selling Q (but no won't do that)
35/4 CV Snapshot Skopar LTM: not good, not recommended on full-frame digital. (good on Sony Nex7 apsc)
90/4 Minolta/Rokkor: not recommended on full-frame digital. (Good on Sony Nex7 apsc)
rented Tri Elmar 16-18-21: not as good as CV 15 on Sony A7r2 UT mod, would never pay $4k to use on Sony (vs what others have said likely without using it), not great at 21 on Sony, but great lens on M10 at all apertures/focals 16 and 21 good on M10 and if I was keeping M10, would buy lens all day.
rented CV 35mm f/2 Lanthar: outstanding from f/5.6 to f/11 for landscape (f/16 not good)
Wenge
Registered User
15 CV Asph wins also good on A7r4
Last edited:
Wenge
Registered User
edit: 35/2.5 Color Skopar II (not 3.5)
Wenge
Registered User
can't edit above, wanted to add I may have an 'off' copy of Tri Elmar, I've seen other examples of this lens doing a lot better on Sony than what I got. Also think I may have an 'exceptional' copy of CV 15/4.5 compared to what others got on tests go figure, not gonna complain.
Taipei-metro
Veteran
Wenge
Registered User
Taipei-metro
Veteran
Wenge
Registered User
Wenge
Registered User
Taipei-metro
Veteran
Ray Vonn 2023
Well-known
Franko
Established
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.