raid
Dad Photographer
It may simply be yet another step to fade out traditional film photography.
When we use MF cameras, we may have to prepre ourselves to pay for developing at a pro lab for C41 film. B&W users can develop at home.
When we use MF cameras, we may have to prepre ourselves to pay for developing at a pro lab for C41 film. B&W users can develop at home.
kuzano
Veteran
And YET?????
And YET?????
And YET... Pro Photo Supply removed their Lab from their store and built a complete new lab around the corner 5-6 years ago... Portland, Oregon/
And YET?????
And YET... Pro Photo Supply removed their Lab from their store and built a complete new lab around the corner 5-6 years ago... Portland, Oregon/
bugmenot
Well-known
In that case, they didn't add a new lab. They just relocated their film processing business 'around the corner'. At least they didn't close down. Always a good sign.
mwooten
light user
Ray,
That is what I find to be most disturbing -- you not getting your negatives back. I think the onus is on the store manager to return your property (unless there is some small print on the send-away envelope stating otherwise). Thankfully, it was a test roll and not something more "valuable", but still the negatives are your property. Perhaps another call to the store manager stating that you want your negatives, or you will be filing at your local small claim court. Name Fujifilm, Walmart and its store manager as defendants.
--michael
farlymac
PF McFarland
I never used the Walmarts that did printing only, while sending the film out for developement. There was one here in town that still did the processing in-store, and I was using them whenever I tested out a new (used) camera. I thought I was buying crappy cameras until I realized it was their crappy scanning. So I quit going there, especially sinec the other stores in town dropped thier in-store labs.
I still use the pro lab in town. But sometimes I just want a quick turnaround with decent scans, and started to go to the closest CVS, getting a Kodak CD because it was better resolution than the store brand one. Then they started to really piss me off when one idiot after another would wreck a roll of film, and then lie to me about what happened. So I stopped going there.
I had been going to Walgreens, but when I looked at the scans, they were the crappiest things I had ever seen. Today, I realized I had been mistaken. I came across one of my Walgreen developement packets, and looked at the prints. They were great, and there was a CD in there too. The index print showed nice scans, and I knew I had loaded some of these pics on the computer before, so I went searching. After looking at the scans on the CD, I realized what I had done. The scans I looked at seven years ago were the thumbnails, with no corrections to them (ie, all kinds of dust marks). The scans I looked at today were the full sized versions, with dust removal. I may have to see if the Walgreens lab is still in operation.
PF
I still use the pro lab in town. But sometimes I just want a quick turnaround with decent scans, and started to go to the closest CVS, getting a Kodak CD because it was better resolution than the store brand one. Then they started to really piss me off when one idiot after another would wreck a roll of film, and then lie to me about what happened. So I stopped going there.
I had been going to Walgreens, but when I looked at the scans, they were the crappiest things I had ever seen. Today, I realized I had been mistaken. I came across one of my Walgreen developement packets, and looked at the prints. They were great, and there was a CD in there too. The index print showed nice scans, and I knew I had loaded some of these pics on the computer before, so I went searching. After looking at the scans on the CD, I realized what I had done. The scans I looked at seven years ago were the thumbnails, with no corrections to them (ie, all kinds of dust marks). The scans I looked at today were the full sized versions, with dust removal. I may have to see if the Walgreens lab is still in operation.
PF
it'sawhat?
Established
Walmart has been phasing this in for months when each store switchs is tied to using up the old envelopes.
TXForester
Well-known
If you can develop C41 at home for 35mm then you could do it for 120. You just go through your chemicals quicker.
gb hill
Veteran
I stopped using WalMart when they stopped 1 hr development. I hated that too because there was a girl who worked there who was really professional at what she did. I could develop a roll of b&w, take the strip to her & she could scan it to CD for me. She wasn't even afraid of scaning negatives with a 1/2 frame camera. Now I have a scanner so I take my C-41 to Rite Aid for developing only. It's getting expensive, they charged me $5.15 to develop my negatives.
David Murphy
Veteran
I've been using Target lately for 35mm C41. Their machine seems to leave a few marks on the film, but the service is excellent otherwise and cheap. The clerk is also very attentive and knowledgeable considering its a discount department store and not a photo dealer.
Messsucherkamera
Established
NEVER let Walk Mart develop your film or work on your car, if you want either one done correctly.
NEVER.
NEVER.
Johnmcd
Well-known
Raid,
C41 is just as easy at home (even easier in some respects), using Tetenal C41 chemicals. It is fool proof with a Jobo CPE 2 or similar and many are doing it with their own temperature control.
The Jobo's are not too cheap but here in Australia they can be found second hand for $200-500. A small investment considering what people are prepared to spend on lenses etc.
Why not give it a try?
Cheers - John
Classique
Well-known
I had the same experience. I received a walmart giftcard so I went to Walmart to develop some 35mm film. However, when I saw the envelope, it said "no negatives will be returned"
As a result, I simply walked out and went to Costco to develop my rolls for even cheaper.
As a result, I simply walked out and went to Costco to develop my rolls for even cheaper.
Particular
a.k.a. CNNY, disassembler
In fact a 120 roll uses about the same amount of chemicals as 35mm. I actually get slightly better milage from 120.
In-camera you would go through the frames more quickly though.
George Bonanno
Well-known
Classique
Well-known
I'm not sure why it all started becoming very ugly in here but I feel that we are in search for large establishments with film development that may give somewhat consistent results (AKA automated developer machines).
The reasons may vary but some of us may not have time to develop our own film or have the equipment. I myself is in the position with small jobo tank and reels I use to develop single rolls at a time but when I come back from a trip or an event shoot with 3-7 rolls, I use costco for development and I scan the negatives myself. I am generally content with their quality of development albeit occasional scratches (which can easily occur with self development)
Back to the main point of the thread...
the OP was wondering when Walmart changed their C41 policy to NOT return the negatives when they used to for many many years. So, my suggestion is that if you cannot grasp the point of the thread, feel free to keep your opinions to yourself.
The reasons may vary but some of us may not have time to develop our own film or have the equipment. I myself is in the position with small jobo tank and reels I use to develop single rolls at a time but when I come back from a trip or an event shoot with 3-7 rolls, I use costco for development and I scan the negatives myself. I am generally content with their quality of development albeit occasional scratches (which can easily occur with self development)
Back to the main point of the thread...
the OP was wondering when Walmart changed their C41 policy to NOT return the negatives when they used to for many many years. So, my suggestion is that if you cannot grasp the point of the thread, feel free to keep your opinions to yourself.
George Bonanno
Well-known
ray*j*gun
Veteran
I agree, its the negative issue that bothers me. Again, it was simply a test to see how the process went for both 35 and 120. I do intend to call Fuji (there is no end to the pain I seem to enjoy) to see what they say. My main objective here is to give the members a heads-up to at least ask the store if they will return the negs BEFORE the envelop is deposited.
Oh BTW NO FINE print re the negs on the envelope.
Oh BTW NO FINE print re the negs on the envelope.
arpinum
Member
Suger - Most Wal-Marts send out to Fuji Professional Services. When Kodachrome was around it got sent to Dwane's. Not exactly minimum wage exploited, baby-stealing stoners. Furthermore, we understand the quality we are receiving and are happy with our process. In the hiking community we say "Hike your own hike".
Look forward to hearing the result of the call to Fuji on Monday.
There seems to be disagreement on the fine print. Perhaps a photo of the statement that negs will not be returned could clear things up?
Look forward to hearing the result of the call to Fuji on Monday.
There seems to be disagreement on the fine print. Perhaps a photo of the statement that negs will not be returned could clear things up?
enasniearth
Well-known
Walmart
Walmart
What I find interesting about the dicussion is that walmart considers the negatives of no value .
So digital has won in that the digital file is the most important archive of the process in the eyes of the big box stores .
Sometimes it is difficult to find a great pro lab in remote locations , there seems to be a grid of walmarts covering the us .
I am lucky in that a great pro lab is 7 miles from my house . Not everyone has that option .
I would never let anyone handle my b&w wet process , however color is another story , the temperature constraints and variables are too much .
Sugar jones has a good point in that we purchase top line lenses and cameras and should opt for the best processing we can find .
If Walmart uses fuji processing great , however the negatives considered not important ( cost savings I assume ) is kind of absurd considering our logic in continuing to use film in the future .
Walmart
What I find interesting about the dicussion is that walmart considers the negatives of no value .
So digital has won in that the digital file is the most important archive of the process in the eyes of the big box stores .
Sometimes it is difficult to find a great pro lab in remote locations , there seems to be a grid of walmarts covering the us .
I am lucky in that a great pro lab is 7 miles from my house . Not everyone has that option .
I would never let anyone handle my b&w wet process , however color is another story , the temperature constraints and variables are too much .
Sugar jones has a good point in that we purchase top line lenses and cameras and should opt for the best processing we can find .
If Walmart uses fuji processing great , however the negatives considered not important ( cost savings I assume ) is kind of absurd considering our logic in continuing to use film in the future .
raid
Dad Photographer
It comes back to the fact that digital imaging is used by the majority of photographers these days. I have just sent an email to a friend who is a Walmart executive to get his feedback on this issue.