Rodchenko
Olympian
If I had a Leica, I'd be off to Edinburgh.
As it is, if there is to be a meet up there, would you allow an Olympus in on the act?
As it is, if there is to be a meet up there, would you allow an Olympus in on the act?
If I had a Leica, I'd be off to Edinburgh.
As it is, if there is to be a meet up there, would you allow an Olympus in on the act?
Well, my last Diana was (as far as I recall) before I met my wife in 1981...Man, I had a Diana and Holga in 1994. I out-hipstered you... 😉 😱
So, who among us had a Fuji Pet in the 60s? They would win the ultimate proto-hipster prize. eek
http://camerapedia.wikia.com/wiki/Fujipet
Seconded. There's a lot of it about.. . . I've published more than 2 dozen books and I've have countless photos published in major magazines. I absolutely love what I do, but it's very hard to carve a niche in this market and keep a foothold. And even if I am successful, I'm certainly not getting rich.
It's a great life if you like being a starving artist.
So take off the grip!I've had a few encounters. The M is just such a weird shape especially with a grip. . .
Eh?if i was there i would have not said i have a digital leica, i wouldn't have wanted to embarrass the guy after what he said about digital leicas.
but i guess that is why i don't own a leica and never will, even if they give to me for free.
Carrying the Olympus might give you a certain degree of immunity from that guy also.
age is an interesting aspect, usually when i get snarky comments it actually from men that are obviously 20+ years older than i am. i am not super young (32) but I make enough to buy myself a leica (but it doesn't mean i don't feel the expense in my account balance), and i suspect sometimes older men have a problem with that.. even my dad who has been a mechanic all his life has a problem accepting that his son makes more than him by "sitting at a computer all day". 😉
Yeah well I find I defend my purchase all the time, but that is part of my personality I think, I just want to explain why I do/get something so that others won't think I'm nuts. It's not a good thing and I'm trying to stop, but I do it..
I did tell my girlfriend last fall "One day I will own a Leica because I want to". When I did have the money I needed I just couldn't justify the purchase, because I didn't really need the camera, I just wanted it, but I had the money and I wasn't going to use them for anything else really. And my girlfriend and one of my best friends said to me "it's y our money, do what the hell you want with them" when I started saying things like "but people are going to think I'm a moron if I pay that much for a camera".
The fact is, that since I got the M9 which I really wanted, nothing else has really interested me, so in that sense it hasn't been more expensive than the handfull of other digital cameras that was passing through my home before I got the Leica.
Then again, I have also worked hard to afford it, just not in the photography business..
But yeah, I do feel I need to justify it all the time for people, and it is annoying.
EDIT:
I forgot to add the thing I was actually going to write: Great photos in that article, the one with the boxers is really great!
Try telling that to a tax inspector.. . . No one has to "justify" the cost of their camera to any other person. . . .
Try telling that to a tax inspector.
Also, unless you are so simple and impulsive that you just do whatever you feel like, when you feel like it, and don't bother to think about it until later, you have to justify things to yourself, balancing acquisitiveness and instant gratification against income and other ways to spend the money.
Cheers,
R.
Try telling that to a tax inspector. Also, unless you are so simple and impulsive that you just do whatever you feel like, when you feel like it, and don't bother to think about it until later, you have to justify things to yourself, balancing acquisitiveness and instant gratification against income and other ways to spend the money. Cheers, R.
First highlight: yes, exactly. To behave otherwise is irresponsible, childish and selfish.I think this is a good way of expressing it. To me, it becomes a combination, and I think in a sense everything needs to be justified somehow, for lack of a better description.
I imagine this sounds utterly ridiculous to a lot of people, but for me it is very natural to ask the question "is it reasonable for me as a hobbyist to buy a Leica when there are people homeless in the street?". It's a really hard internal conflict for me to be honest. I think I don't consider it reasonable, but I did it anyway, which I guess means I opted for "ignoring my values". Sometimes that happens, sometimes it don't. Like I said, this time I opted for buying the thing, but I also believe somewhere in my heart that it is behavior like that that turns our world to ****.
I think it really ties together with my view of the world and my personal values. And also in big part the deeply rooted "jantelagen" in Swedish society. 🙂
Actually (in the UK at least) a tax inspector cannot tell you how to run a business and what tools you should use, as far as I am aware........Try telling that to a tax inspector.
No, but he can dispute your expenses. And, if you're claiming a camera -- any camera -- against taxes, you'd better be able to show that you're using it in your business.Actually (in the UK at least) a tax inspector cannot tell you how to run a business and what tools you should use, as far as I am aware........