The constant noise, homeless activity and drug use are doing nothing to further anyone's cause.
Plus one (ten characters)I don't know if I'd call what's going on at Zuccati "exciting." 😉
It has devolved into a degenerate hippie fest of foulness. I was onboard with the "movement" in the beginning, but there's no more clear direction (if they ever really even had one) and I think most people have lost interest in the whole thing. At least that's the impression we get here in New York. The constant noise, homeless activity and drug use are doing nothing to further anyone's cause.
Nice pictures, though. 🙂
The occupy Toronto people might be cleared out tonight and they have called people to come to St. James park at 11pm. Its tempting to go but its not worth a sleepless night, potential arrest and night photos which will be the same with hundreds or more photographers out there.
It was also very Canadian of the city to issue them a notice and plenty of time to clear our, unlike the middle of the night raid with stormtroopers...
I visited the St. James park about 2 weeks ago and I spoke to a few people on why they are there, what they hope to achieve, how things should be changed, etc...
I remember myself being very disappointed with the answers. I realize the intention is good, but when there is no clear direction as a whole, the movement gradually loses legitimacy.
The whole place had this hippie-like ambiance, and many of the folks there couldn't hold a job even before all this happened. I don't feel that they are rightfully representing the 99%.
Legitimacy? No. Credibility? Perhaps.
But remember that most anti-colonial movements started out with a wide range of ideals, dreams and demands, and coalesced into (often successful) movements to kick out what they perceived as the 'ruling class'. And what the "Occupy" people are complaining about, whether you agree with them or not, is the colonization (= exploitation) of the poor by the rich.
Yes, it may dissolve into nothing. Or it may not. I mean, who could ' rightfully represent the 99%', if most of the 99% are wage slaves working their arses off to pay their tuition fees, mortgages, car payments, health care costs (in the US), and so forth?
Debt is good only for the lenders, who are part of the bogeyman labelled (probably with more flair than accuracy) 'the 1%'. For those who owe money, most debt is unalleviated bad news.
I'm an old hippie. in the 60s I wore kaftans, had shoulder length hair, the whole bit. But nowadays (a) we don't have much in the way of "Occupy..." movements in France and (b) I'm old and lazy and fond of e.g. flush toilets, so I rather admire those who get off their bums and "occupy". It would be REALLY interesting to ask some of these "Occupy..." protesters what they'd be doing if they weren't "occupying". Which is better: staying home and smoking dope (the popular slur) or getting out and trying to change a system in which the best option is to stay home and smoke dope?
I believe that long after we're dead, and people read the history books of the 21st century in a hundred years' time, the "Occupy" movement is quite likely to be seen as an important movement, whether it changes society or not; or at the very least, as an important footnote. And if there are silver halide B+W prints, some people are going to say, "Wow! Can you imagine that? They were actually THERE. And this print was made from a piece of film that was THERE."
You can say this of anything you believe to be an important popular movement, such as the Tea Party, so it ain't party political. Wouldn't you be fascinated to see more pictures of Gandhi? Or pictures of 1930s-era Germany that weren't Nazi propaganda? Or pictures that actually show how filthy and slovenly the "Occupy" protesters are? Because without the pictures, is anyone going to believe you?
Cheers,
R.
The occupy Toronto people might be cleared out tonight and they have called people to come to St. James park at 11pm. Its tempting to go but its not worth a sleepless night, potential arrest and night photos which will be the same with hundreds or more photographers out there.
It was also very Canadian of the city to issue them a notice and plenty of time to clear our, unlike the middle of the night raid with stormtroopers...
It would be REALLY interesting to ask some of these "Occupy..." protesters what they'd be doing if they weren't "occupying". Which is better: staying home and smoking dope (the popular slur) or getting out and trying to change a system in which the best option is to stay home and smoke dope?
Legitimacy? No. Credibility? Perhaps.
But remember that most anti-colonial movements started out with a wide range of ideals, dreams and demands, and coalesced into (often successful) movements to kick out what they perceived as the 'ruling class'. And what the "Occupy" people are complaining about, whether you agree with them or not, is the colonization (= exploitation) of the poor by the rich.
Yes, it may dissolve into nothing. Or it may not. I mean, who could ' rightfully represent the 99%', if most of the 99% are wage slaves working their arses off to pay their tuition fees, mortgages, car payments, health care costs (in the US), and so forth?
Debt is good only for the lenders, who are part of the bogeyman labelled (probably with more flair than accuracy) 'the 1%'. For those who owe money, most debt is unalleviated bad news.
I'm an old hippie. in the 60s I wore kaftans, had shoulder length hair, the whole bit. But nowadays (a) we don't have much in the way of "Occupy..." movements in France and (b) I'm old and lazy and fond of e.g. flush toilets, so I rather admire those who get off their bums and "occupy". It would be REALLY interesting to ask some of these "Occupy..." protesters what they'd be doing if they weren't "occupying". Which is better: staying home and smoking dope (the popular slur) or getting out and trying to change a system in which the best option is to stay home and smoke dope?
I believe that long after we're dead, and people read the history books of the 21st century in a hundred years' time, the "Occupy" movement is quite likely to be seen as an important movement, whether it changes society or not; or at the very least, as an important footnote. And if there are silver halide B+W prints, some people are going to say, "Wow! Can you imagine that? They were actually THERE. And this print was made from a piece of film that was THERE."
You can say this of anything you believe to be an important popular movement, such as the Tea Party, so it ain't party political. Wouldn't you be fascinated to see more pictures of Gandhi? Or pictures of 1930s-era Germany that weren't Nazi propaganda? Or pictures that actually show how filthy and slovenly the "Occupy" protesters are? Because without the pictures, is anyone going to believe you?
Cheers,
R.