What about a Fuji with M-mount?

What about a Fuji with M-mount?

  • Yes, I'll definitely buy it, it's a great news!

    Votes: 74 35.2%

  • Yes, I might get it, it might be cool

    Votes: 101 48.1%

  • No thanks / Useless / Not interested

    Votes: 26 12.4%

  • Other (pls explain)

    Votes: 9 4.3%
  • Total voters
    210
  • Poll closed .
jsrockit said:
Fuji certainly could start making [M-mount lenses]. The M mount can be used by anyone.
Click to expand...

Yes, sure, you're right, they could. I just don't think they will.

I would not if I were Fuji; there already are 2 bigger names in the market (Leica, Zeiss) and a business associate (Cosina) manufactures very good but reasonably priced lenses.

Also from what I've understood M-mount rules out autofocus. I'm under the impression that autofocus engines finally are starting to get good, so they'll want to use one, I guess.
 
Tompas said:
Also from what I've understood M-mount rules out autofocus.
Click to expand...

And I can see lots of people complaining on the Internets about what a fatal design flaw that is, because, you know, their Nikon D3 has autofocus and it's better, etc. etc. and shame on Lei...err...on Fuji!
 
Sounds like a digital Contax G2??? Full-frame, interchangeable jewel-like lenses, AF/AE, compact, "modern" take on a classic?

I'd buy one. And with a cool hybrid finder, I'd also take a 21mm, 35mm, and 50mm 😀
 
It sure is nice fantasizing about it, but it won't happen any time soon - Leicas Japan affiliations are elsewhere, and Fuji could not do it without cooperation/licenses from Leica. A hybrid electronic viewfinder has to compensate for the finder/live view parallax, and for that it will require knowledge about the lens and its settings. Leica lenses only recently grew the capability to identify themselves to the camera - that will be patented for quite a few years to come.
 
boffen said:
I don't want AF, a hybrid viewfinder or movie mode or anything like that though. I would just like a cheaper, digital M.
Click to expand...

If sony can put together the NEX-7 for $1200, I'm sure they could make a similar camera with and optical rangefinder for under $2k. I just don't think anyone will–I don't think that they see a market for it. Definitely not Sony, unless they could turn it into some kind of market-speak, like "TRUVIEW INFINITY OF" or something like that.

I like the fuji hybrid vf idea, and hopefully it will move forward in future iterations of the x series... but I don't expect anyone aside from Leica can sell a lot of cameras that are totally manual focus, M or whatever mount these days. And that's part of why they're so expensive...
 
It would a fun product, options are always good. Give the Epson folks some where to go other than an M8. Would I buy one, no. Strange as it sounds I'm happy with my GRD III. I wonder if they are talking with Pres. K about a Bessa body update?

B2
 
We get this kind of discussion every two weeks or so. Is there an "Ignore Thread" option that will make these things vanish from the front page?
 
I don't see why Fuji could not make a M-mount camera, hypothetically. Cosina make M-mount cameras and I don't think they pay anything to Leica. Ricoh just made a M-mount module and they don't pay anything. So why would Fuji?
 
Harry S. said:
An M8 wasn't $2000 when new. They certainly dont have the sensor performance of any new camera either.
Click to expand...

No one cares what they cost when new. Now they're a $2000 digital M. That's what counts.

If you want more than that, expect to pay more than that. Take a look at Fuji's medium format rangefinder pricing to see what happens when a camera won't sell in large numbers.

If people want their pipe dream digital rangefinder of the day to have better sensor performance, a larger sensor, a hybrid viewfinder and be cheaper - well, they better prepare to get laughed out of the door.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom