kshapero
South Florida Man
Been using Fuji Superia, but I am intrigued by Kodak's redo of Portra's.
uhligfd
Well-known
Why not put Kodak 400 UC into the line up?
It is by far the best (from my experience); the NC is too dull, the VC too poppy. 400UC is just super all around. Also very cheap at all Walmarts at three 36 exp rolls for 12$ ...
It is by far the best (from my experience); the NC is too dull, the VC too poppy. 400UC is just super all around. Also very cheap at all Walmarts at three 36 exp rolls for 12$ ...
uhligfd
Well-known
Actually there are at least two Agfa negative films at 400: Optima and HDC. I did prefer HDC of these.
So, please poster, do expand the list of films we can vote on, or accept that "other" wins the day.
So, please poster, do expand the list of films we can vote on, or accept that "other" wins the day.
kshapero
South Florida Man
Let the masses speak. Maybe other will win the day. Can't figure how to add other choices.
jmi
Established
Quite liked NPH (and presumably therefore, pro400), but I too am intrigued by Portra, and I've heard good things about it, particularly the 160s. My first roll of the older 400VC at the lab now, going to pick up tomorrow. Of course now they have changed it I'll have to try again... d'oh!
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
I still have some Konica 400 (and 800), Agfa Vista 400 in the fridge. I like them better than Fuji Xtra 400. But anything is better than Kodak Max. ::blech::
Kodak UC 400 and HD200 and HD400 are nice, though.
Kodak UC 400 and HD200 and HD400 are nice, though.
sbug
Acceptably Sharp
Another vote for the missing Kodak 400UC. It's my choice based on availability and the fact that it is a fine film.
sockeyed
Well-known
I can't say that I'm a fan of the Kodak 400UC - I find it too yellowish and really not too kind on Asian skin tones. It does have great reds though.
I still haven't found a 400 film that I really like, but something I do find very good is Fuji NPZ800 (or 800Z) exposed at 500 - great colours and fine grain.
Samples:
I still haven't found a 400 film that I really like, but something I do find very good is Fuji NPZ800 (or 800Z) exposed at 500 - great colours and fine grain.
Samples:



Dougg
Seasoned Member
I like both Kodak 400UC and Fuji NPH400, excellent films, and pretty much my standard film speed, as I also use Ilford XP2 400... all with meter set to 250.
Cooki
Filmosaurus Canadiensis
UC 400, If I'm gonna shoot colour that's my fave. {this week}
RayPA
Ignore It (It'll go away)
uhligfd said:Why not put Kodak 400 UC into the line up?
It is by far the best (from my experience); the NC is too dull, the VC too poppy. 400UC is just super all around. Also very cheap at all Walmarts at three 36 exp rolls for 12$ ...
That's where my 'Other' vote is going...love the stuff.
Al Patterson
Ferroequinologist
I haven't used print film since Kodak stopped Royal Gold. I absolutely HATE the Max lineup. I'll have to see what wins here and give it a try...
clintock
Galleryless Gearhead
I've found a huge part of what print film looks best is the settings of the lab when they make the print. A place that has it set for Superia makes lame prints with kodak sometimes, and vice versa.. They are supposed to adjust for the film, but I think that gets missed sometimes.
Not popular with forums, the noritsu machinine at my Costco does best with Kodak HD.
Not popular with forums, the noritsu machinine at my Costco does best with Kodak HD.
Last edited:
jano
Evil Bokeh
sockeyed said:I still haven't found a 400 film that I really like, but something I do find very good is Fuji NPZ800 (or 800Z) exposed at 500 - great colours and fine grain.
I just tried this 800Z film in 120, and wow, what a beautiful film. Also converts well to b&w, if you're into that sort of faux thing. I will try shooting it at 500, seems like a neat idea
I really like Kodak Porta.
Athena
Well-known
I chose Fuji Supeira but actually I usually use Reala
Don't know what I really shoul've chosen! :bang:
Don't know what I really shoul've chosen! :bang:
Athena
Well-known
Athena said:I chose Fuji Supeira but actually I usually use Reala
Don't know what I really shoul've chosen! :bang:
Oops - so sorry - I failed to realize that this was limited to 400 film.
My bad.
Please forgive.
Dougg
Seasoned Member
jano, 800Z (NPZ800) at 500 is my favorite for my mostly-indoor environmental portraits with medium-format RFs... You'll see a bunch of it in my RFF gallery. I will choose NPS 160 at 100 if I am dedicating a body to slower film for outdoor use. For 6x7 SLR and 35mm I stick closer to NPH 400 at 250. I've shot a few rolls of NPZ in 35mm too and I was amazed at the quality with such a fast film. My local pro lab uses Agfa machinery and the lab manager says it does better with Fuji than with Kodak. I still like 400UC but it's more expensive.
popstar
Well-known
I wish 400UC was on here as well, as my vote had to go for 'other'. I don't shoot nearly as much color as I used to do. But when I need color, it's usually 400UC I choose.
W
wlewisiii
Guest
If I need the speed, I use Fuji Superia - Supermarket is how I think of it as 4 packs are cheap at my local grocery story. But really, for color work I far prefer Fuji Reala to anything else I've tried.
William
William
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.