S
Socke
Guest
Vince, we're talking old cameras, new cameras with adapted framelines are no problem in my opinion. Rangefinders less than SLRs where the viewfinders size depends on the sensor.
VinceC said:>>1. Less than full frame. AFAIC this is a deal breaker.<<
Why this full-frame hangup? Look what it did to the Leica digital? The "gotta have fullframe" is precisely the same reason "full format" photographers a couple of generations ago refused to switch to miniature Leicas -- they demanded fullframe. Their magnificent fullframe TLRs and Speed Graphics are now pretty darned cheap on EBay because not many people want to use them.
40oz said:what is "in a digital way?"
Bingo. (In my case, a Minolta DiMage 5400 film scanner.)mike goldberg said:I like the fact that dedicated scanning, whether done with a Noritsu Koki QSS-29,
Nikon Coolscan V ED or KM Scan Dual IV is my link or interface, between the analog
world of film cameras and lenses from the 60's and 70's and the computer. I really don't feel the need for anything more.
mike goldberg said:<cropped>
I'm with ElrodCod above: We really do NOT need any more of a digital solution
for analog cameras, than we already have. Solution? What's the problem?
Cheers, mike ;-)