raid amin said:No clue. Mine has number about 97500 or so. It is still in mint condition.
back alley said:buy that m2 that is for sale.
play with it till you want to move on and then sell it to me at a horrible loss🙂🙂🙂
ray_g said:I have an M2, that I chose to keep over the M3. No regrets about the choice, just about the M3 part. 🙂 Hmmm... maybe when you are done playing, YOU can sell it back to me for a horrible loss. For wear and tear, you know. 🙂
Brian Sweeney said:The Leica IIIF is a converted IIIc, probably 1946 or 47.
back alley said:curses, foiled again!
now i'm curious...how come ya kept the m2?
joe
ray_g said:October 1959.
A 46 year-old virgin. :bang:
raid amin said:Ray: It has number 975,000 and not 97,500. A typo.,
ray_g said:Cause I have used it and the M6 a lot and have gotten used to the .72 finder. When I started shooting with the M3 again, it took some time to adjust. I figured I didn't need another variable to account for. That, plus it just had a CLA, shutter and frameline replacement with DAG last year.
You, on the other hand, are used to 1x finders on the P, and now on the ZI.
I also have been shooting more 35mm.