akptc
Shoot first, think later
Rich, I love the feel of your shots - thank you!
doubs43 said:Look closer and you'll see "5cm" clearly engraved on the Elmar. I think you've mistaken the aperture marking for the focal lenmgth.
Walker
Fred, thanks a bunch for the advice. I've already reloaded with Tmax 400, pre-cut a few more rolls and will shoot 'till I get it right (the family is considering a vacation w/out me 🙂).yossarian said:Andy, another consideration is lighting of the particular subjects...
Fred
akptc said:Fred, thanks a bunch for the advice. I've already reloaded with Tmax 400, pre-cut a few more rolls and will shoot 'till I get it right (the family is considering a vacation w/out me 🙂).
Sorry Fred... btw, the seller just emailed me, said the bag was in pristine condition 😉yossarian said:It serves you right for buying the bag I wanted 😀
Fred
akptc said:Sorry Fred... btw, the seller just emailed me, said the bag was in pristine condition 😉
- Which Leica lens would be the modern incarnation of the Elmar 50/3.5?Mike Kovacs said:... That it seems barely different from much more modern lenses is quite a credit to the achievement Leitz made in the 1920's with this lens!...
lubitel said:is that normal that the Elmar lens has feet markings and not meter?