Which do you like best ???

[michaelwj]

Sorry if I missed it, but what is the site for? A business, forum, sharing, etc site? What's the donate button for? I don't get either of them. One is yelling at me, the other doesn't say anything...
Michael

 

[rwintle]

To my eye, "A" is far too busy. So I vote "B" for cleanliness.

 

[Coopersounds]

I voted b. Seems less cluttered

 

[gm13]

A if you're appealing to those 33 and under, their neurotransmitters have evolved
to be pummeled with oodles of information from all angles.
B if older age bracket, crotchety folks who still use film,
shoot with rangefinders and enjoy the clean, less complicated approach
because that's all their processors can handle.

 

[Spanik]

Neither.

A is soo busy and gives the impression of being all about "talking about photo's" that I wouldn't expect to find anything interesting in it. Photo's all over the place but formatted and presented differently. Looks like an explosion in a lab.

While B looks fine as an album but I wouldn't have a clue what to expect, except more landscape photo's. I do not like the large white borders in B. If there would be "something" (photographer, date, link to comments) in them it might be ok.

 

[Roger Hicks]

I'd certainly agree with Gene about the age divide, but then, if I want to look at a picture, I don't want to look at 45 tiny pictures simultaneously, surrounded with "likes" and "have your say". I don't really give a toss what other people think: I'm interested in my reaction to the photographer's picture, not in everybody else's votes on a FaceTube page. It's not "all I can handle": it's "all I'm interested in".

As for "not about photography", I agree. It's "ME! ME! ME! .... oh, and I do pictures too."

By these criteria, B is less bad than A.

Cheers,

R.