I still don't have the 105/135mm that is the only focal length mentioned that I didn't have. And I'm unlikely to fill that gap, as this is getting pretty long for an RF camera, and longer than I generally have call for even on SLR.
It's useful for me to rotate through the lenses available to help push me to see a little differently.
It's useful for me to rotate through the lenses available to help push me to see a little differently.
splash_fr
Member
I don't have anything longer than 50mm!
Ronald M
Veteran
24/ 35 is the best combo. SLR kits are that way for me. When I started, Leica had no 24 so I used 21/28/35. The Mandler no longer works well on M9 AND I replaced it with 28 2.8 ASPH. Small tight lens. The 24 is too big and requires a finder.
If I had no other wides other than the 35, I would have the 24.
If I had no other wides other than the 35, I would have the 24.
danielsterno
making soup from mud
mainly/only a 35 priority with some 50 & when i use the 50 i always love it-go figure… nothing else- i would of also had a zoom of not having- which i do not…
kaiwasoyokaze
Half Frame Goodness
my only wide angle option right now is the converted 28mm 3.5 pancake from ms optical. it uses the lens out of the fujifilm super mini. i would like to go to 21mm though as its easy to get the feel of the angle of view (90 degrees) from the camera.
Rayt
Nonplayer Character
It is very difficult for me to get the true view of wide angles beyond a 28mm with a separate finder. I prefer to use wides on an SLR so I know what I am shooting. An external viewfinder only shows me the framing not the feel.
NJH
Member
Other way round surely, I use either a CV 21/25 or Leica 21/28 external finder and find they do a really good job of conveying the enormous depth in wide angle views. Framing though is always a bit hit and miss in various ways.
Back OT I must be the odd man out as I don't have a 35. Would like to get one though at some point.
Back OT I must be the odd man out as I don't have a 35. Would like to get one though at some point.
Bill Clark
Veteran
I'm without many of them:
15, 18, 21, 24/25, 28, 40, 75, 105/135
Whew!
Lot of stuff I'm missing!
15, 18, 21, 24/25, 28, 40, 75, 105/135
Whew!
Lot of stuff I'm missing!
Lluis Abad
Member
I'm also looking for a 28I've 21mm, 35mm, 40mm, 50mm & 90mm lenses. The only focal length I'm interested in is 28mm. That's coz my M6 And CLE both have 28mm frame lines, thus eliminating that need for an external viewfinder. I'm considering the CV Ultron 28/2 or the Zeiss 28/2.8. Would really love having a 28mm Summicron or Elmarit but those are way out of my budget right now
but if Elmarit, much better.
The problem $$$$
But the slightest opportunity
zass, the shim my M8.
greetings
Lluis Abad
Member
riverie
Member
the only one I have is 50mm. I use to have 35mm but i found it 50mm is more versatile for me.
kxl
Social Documentary
Hi Luis - I don't have an M8, so I can't really comment on how it would perform on an M8. I use it on a Sony A7R and a Zeiss ZI (for B&W), and on those bodies, the M-Hexanon has excellent almost even sharpness from center to the edges, beautiful color (although not he head-turning color of Ziess lenses) and just a slight light fall off on the A7R (even less so on the ZI). Although I am a big fan of Zeiss lenses, when it comes to a 28mm lens, I prefer the Hex to the ZM 28mm. This one's a keeper.
Canyongazer
Canyongazer
(my film RFs are long gone....hope digital RF Wannabes can qualify for the discussion)
For RF, I have never felt a need for longer than 90 or wider than 28.
I never have gotten along with the 35. Usually too short or not wide enough.
If you demanded "Pick one!" I'd pick a 50.
Add a 28 if I get to pick two.
For RF, I have never felt a need for longer than 90 or wider than 28.
I never have gotten along with the 35. Usually too short or not wide enough.
If you demanded "Pick one!" I'd pick a 50.
Add a 28 if I get to pick two.
dct
perpetual amateur
15/28/50/90mm is the standard I need and own.
The only one I'm looking for in addition to those is one of the faster 75mm.
The only one I'm looking for in addition to those is one of the faster 75mm.
B.Toews
Well-known
I currently have a 35 and 50, although I plan to add a 21 and 90 at some point.
meeker
Established
15/35/50/90 here.
filmtwit
Desperate but not serious
Just wondering, how many of you regularly use the 28mm?
I've found it rather useless as I generally am fine back at 35mm or I want little more wide so go for 24mm instead.
I've found it rather useless as I generally am fine back at 35mm or I want little more wide so go for 24mm instead.
burancap
Veteran
AHK! I missed the "NOT." Sorry.
f16sunshine
Moderator
I have the the 40mm rokkor in M mount.
In LTM I have the 50mm Color Skopar, Canon 1.2/50mm, and Yashinon 50mm f1.8.
That's it.... I'm done experimenting with other FL's and lenses for interchangeable lens RF cameras.
Still in love with Fixed lens/ leaf shutter cameras where the Fuji GF670 and Hexar AF are my main squeezes.
In LTM I have the 50mm Color Skopar, Canon 1.2/50mm, and Yashinon 50mm f1.8.
That's it.... I'm done experimenting with other FL's and lenses for interchangeable lens RF cameras.
Still in love with Fixed lens/ leaf shutter cameras where the Fuji GF670 and Hexar AF are my main squeezes.
kxl
Social Documentary
From my own experience and some general observation... for those whose primary lens is a 35mm, it seems like their preferred WA is 24/25mm, while for those whose primary lens is 50mm, the WA of choice is 28mm.
I used to shoot a lot with the 35mm and preferred the 25mm for WA; when I started to gravitate to the 50mm, I started to find the 35mm useless and started to shoot quite a bit with the 28mm for WA, and sometimes, even as my primary lens.