rbiemer
Unabashed Amateur
Clearly a Nikon, but F2? Maybe? Or a bit later? Kind of looks like an Fm2 but I don't know them well enough to really say.
I would really like to see the contact sheet from this.
Rob

I would really like to see the contact sheet from this.
Rob
Corran
Well-known
Just a plain ol' F
ktmrider
Well-known
Believe Nikon F because the shutter release is located to the rear and prism has the correct profile.
Larry Cloetta
Veteran
Wondering what percentage of forum members can immediately name that driver.
KoNickon
Nick Merritt
Nikon F; Graham Hill, yes?
Ricoh
Well-known
Yes Graham Hill, a legend. Must have had strong neck muscles!
Rumour has it he would have a nip of scotch before a race.
Rumour has it he would have a nip of scotch before a race.
rbiemer
Unabashed Amateur
Thank you, gents!
Rob
Rob
KoNickon
Nick Merritt
He "died in action" as I recall, but which race? Agree about his neck muscles -- especially considering the G forces involved.
madNbad
Well-known
The lens is a Nikkor-H 28 3.5.
KoNickon
Nick Merritt
So how was the shutter tripped? I see some lever on the lower left of the bracket (i.e. right side in the picture) but I can't believe Hill would be taking his hands off the wheel and shifter.
Dwig
Well-known
So how was the shutter tripped? I see some lever on the lower left of the bracket (i.e. right side in the picture) but I can't believe Hill would be taking his hands off the wheel and shifter.
Shutter is tripped electrically via the F36 motor drive. You can see the electrical connector low on the "rewind" side of the drive. It provided the electrical power for the drive as well as the shutter release.
I'm not so sure that the lens is a 28mm f/3.5. It looks more like the 21mm f/4 to me.
John Bragg
Well-known
Wondering what percentage of forum members can immediately name that driver.
Graham Hill, late father of Damon Hill
steveyork
Well-known
Definitely an F. Just one of 1,000,000 or so that were made.
Noserider
Christiaan Phleger
More likely the mirror-up only 21mm f/4 considering the subject material; a 28 would be too narrow to get the effect of seeing the view from the drivers perspective.
Franko
Established
He did not die racing but in a private plane crash. He was a favorite from the golden age of racing.
Corran
Well-known
I don't think it's the 21mm. I have one, it's a bit fatter nose and doesn't have a silver face ring (though, might be a filter).
https://www.destoutz.ch/lens_2.1cm_f4_225015.html#thumb
https://www.destoutz.ch/lens_2.1cm_f4_225015.html#thumb
robert blu
quiet photographer
I must be old! At least old enough to recognize soon Graham Hill! It was the time I was following F1 races.
madNbad
Well-known
It's a 21. Found a photo of Jackie Stewart with the same setup:
https://www.pinterest.co.kr/pin/503206958334257113/
Maybe even the same race? 1966 Monaco Gramd Prix.
https://www.pinterest.co.kr/pin/503206958334257113/
Maybe even the same race? 1966 Monaco Gramd Prix.
madNbad
Well-known
Wandering further down the internet rabbit hole, it's a Gordon Enterprises Helmet mount and a couple of sources point toward a modified Pentax 18mm. Apparently they were worn in practice for the 1966 Monaco Grand Prix. Here's another link:
http://nikongear.net/revival/index.php?topic=5244.0
http://nikongear.net/revival/index.php?topic=5244.0
BillBingham2
Registered User
It looks too shallow for the 21. There is no dull chrome part at the bottom. Also, the first element looks larger for the 2.1cm. If it had a filter I would expect a reflection on the moniker not just the glass.
Looks like a Marty Forscher special if I was guessing.
B2
Looks like a Marty Forscher special if I was guessing.
B2
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.