Bosk
Make photos, not war.
I ask because I haven't seen any vented hoods on Nikon/Canon/Pentax lenses, and I'm wondering what the rationale behind the design is. Thanks.
Yes, that's it. And it's not true that only Leica had such hoods. The Canon 50/1.2 has a giant vented hood, as well as the Nikon 50/1.1 (which was even more giant). Smaller lenses/hoods do not intrude in the viewfinder frame, that's why most Nikons/Canons lenses had unvented tubular or conic hoods.lubitel said:... I think its so that it doesnt block your view through the VF as much.
Didier said:Yes, that's it. And it's not true that only Leica had such hoods. The Canon 50/1.2 has a giant vented hood, as well as the Nikon 50/1.1 (which was even more giant).
Will said:Or you can get one machined.
Didier said:Wow, is that for the 0.95 Canon? Even fatter than TomA's Replica Nikkor Hood...
Didier
Bosk said:I ask because I haven't seen any vented hoods on Nikon/Canon/Pentax lenses, and I'm wondering what the rationale behind the design is. Thanks.
kshapero said:So if the lens hood is vented to allow the eye to see the subject, doesn't that also allow light thru and negate the reason to have a lens hood?
Thoughtful design. I've replaced any vented hoods I have with regular hoods from heavystar. I think RF cams should be small if possible... 🙂RayPA said:The vented hood for my Hexanon 35/2 has a very nice feature. Once it is screwed on tight to the lens it can be pivoted back about a quarter turn without unscrewing, to allow perfect positioning of the hood..