Jurat
Member
I think the Fuji X series legitimately belongs in the rangefinder section not the non-rangefinder section right? They are all 3 good cameras with rangefinders. Or why is it in the non-rangefinder section?
It's technically not a rangefinder.
Yup, there is no actual rangefinder inside the Fuji cameras.
It's a point and shoot camera.
The ideal definition for "Rangefinder camera" would be something like "A non-reflex camera with a built-in manual rangefinder."
That excludes all autofocus cameras, scale focus cameras, SLRs and TLRs. It includes both coupled and uncoupled manual focus rangefinder cameras only. It also leaves the door open for an autofocus camera that can switch to manual rangefinder mode (I wish).
The Fuji X is in the same boat as the Contax G. If you consider either of them to be rangefinders, then you must include all autofocus cameras as rangefinders, because by definition all autofocus mechanisms measure distance. So your iPhone becomes a rangefinder. Obviously the term loses any meaning if you do that.
The X, G, NEX and µ4/3 all belong to the same class of cameras, which unfortunately has no consensus name yet. I prefer "mirrorless," as the alternatives are uniformly terrible. (Compact System Camera? Interchangeable Lens Compact? Blah.)
no camera is a rangefinder 🙂
this is a rangefinder:![]()
and what if there was? There is a rangefinder in a U-Boat periscope, but nobody calls a U-Boat a "rangefinder" 🙂
there is no definition of a point and shoot camera, therefore calling it that means pretty much nothing 🙂
there is no definition of a point and shoot camera, therefore calling it that means pretty much nothing 🙂
The ideal definition for "Rangefinder camera" would be something like "A non-reflex camera with a built-in manual rangefinder."
That excludes all autofocus cameras, scale focus cameras, SLRs and TLRs. It includes both coupled and uncoupled manual focus rangefinder cameras only. It also leaves the door open for an autofocus camera that can switch to manual rangefinder mode (I wish).
The Fuji X is in the same boat as the Contax G. If you consider either of them to be rangefinders, then you must include all autofocus cameras as rangefinders, because by definition all autofocus mechanisms measure distance. So your iPhone becomes a rangefinder. Obviously the term loses any meaning if you do that.
The X, G, NEX and µ4/3 all belong to the same class of cameras, which unfortunately has no consensus name yet. I prefer "mirrorless," as the alternatives are uniformly terrible. (Compact System Camera? Interchangeable Lens Compact? Blah.)
In my book any camera that you can point at a subject, press the shutter button and get a reasonably exposed, focussed negative qualifies. So, F100 (w/ an AF lens), G2, Fuji X.
And in some cases, an M7 at f16.
😀
In my book any camera that you can point at a subject, press the shutter button and get a reasonably exposed, focussed negative qualifies. So, F100 (w/ an AF lens), G2, Fuji X.
And in some cases, an M7 at f16.
😀
The ideal definition for "Rangefinder camera" would be something like "A non-reflex camera with a built-in manual rangefinder."
That excludes all autofocus cameras, scale focus cameras, SLRs and TLRs. It includes both coupled and uncoupled manual focus rangefinder cameras only. It also leaves the door open for an autofocus camera that can switch to manual rangefinder mode (I wish).
The Fuji X is in the same boat as the Contax G. If you consider either of them to be rangefinders, then you must include all autofocus cameras as rangefinders, because by definition all autofocus mechanisms measure distance. So your iPhone becomes a rangefinder. Obviously the term loses any meaning if you do that.
The X, G, NEX and µ4/3 all belong to the same class of cameras, which unfortunately has no consensus name yet. I prefer "mirrorless," as the alternatives are uniformly terrible. (Compact System Camera? Interchangeable Lens Compact? Blah.)