Sejanus.Aelianus
Veteran
The two sides here are just talking past each other.
That sums it up well. Perhaps we could all agree that the Leica is as to the upper vehicle and, say, the Nikon D700 or Canon 6D is as to the lower vehicle?
The two sides here are just talking past each other.
That sums it up well. Perhaps we could all agree that the Leica is as to the upper vehicle and, say, the Nikon D700 or Canon 6D is as to the lower vehicle?
No. Not buying it. All of the cameras are working gear. THAT is most definitely a toy car. What kind of car is it anyway?
That ought to keep things stirred up.That sums it up well. Perhaps we could all agree that the Leica is as to the upper vehicle and, say, the Nikon D700 or Canon 6D is as to the lower vehicle?
Do you actually know what "non sequitur" means?Quite the non-sequitur.
And the Canon digitals, I know from experience, aren't near as durable as the truck in the photo.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCT-YMgjm9k
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1tTBncIsm8
I'd love to see you do half of this to an M9 or an M240.
I do however care that they are not dissuaded from buying a very fine rangefinder camera by someone who chose to buy an Olympus SLR instead, just because it's cheaper, and who clearly does not value Leicas enough to buy one.
faberryman said:My feeling is that if you want a Leica for whatever reason, and you can afford one, go for it. Life is short.
The first picture shows an unusual "smart" brand car variant. The company is a subsidiary of Mercedes.
A friend used to commute from rural Kent to central London, usually in his 911 but sometimes in his Maserati Ghibli. Both were surprisingly practical cars on smooth flat roads in Kent and London in the 1970s and 1980s, and he had secure parking at his studio. He was also the most knowledgeable person I ever met (I think) about Leica history. And he had earned his all money as a photographer, with Hasselblads, Gandolfis, Leicas, Nikons...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCT-YMgjm9k
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1tTBncIsm8
I'd love to see you do half of this to an M9 or an M240.
It does? Why? If you're determined to shower derision on Leica owners, you'll use any excuse. If you're not, you won't, especially an excuse as feeble as this.This is precisely the kind of comment that earns Leica owners the derision of others.
Right at 20K with my MM no problems. First my 5Ds were both in the shop several times and both my 5DIIs have been in several times. A complete shutter failure in a 5DII while shooting for NATO when it was in Chicago back in may of 2012. Real world is what counts.
And the lens didn't spontaneously combust when you screwed in the cap?32 years an in the shop one time about 9 years ago.
![]()
I've known other photographers who liked expensive cars too. I just don't see any more connection between their cameras and their cars than I do between my cameras and my inexpensive cars: Peugeot 309 and Land Rover 88 inch series III.
R.

The real world that you extrapolated to from a sample size of... you. My Oly E510 is 7 years old and hasn't been in despite the occasional tumble, bump and drop. Still keeps going, but I'm not going to claim it is more reliable than a 7D overall because it probably isn't. Particularly with CPS - Oly doesn't have anything like it, and for that matter neither does Leica. For the film cameras you routinely see posts here about the long repair times from DAG, Golden Touch or Youxin Ye, and for the digitals it's just straight back to Solms or to Leica NJ if it's minor.
Dear Vince,Roger, see any connection between the Porsche, and Monochrom and this?
Priorities by Vince.Lupo, on Flickr
Unless it's maybe an interest in the unusual!