Will you please delete that!

Going back to the original post - I just have this fantasy that this elderly couple were, er - shall we say - "involved in an illicit relationship".

A few weeks ago I was shooting some pics over by Dag Haamerskjold Plaza by the UN Building. There was an outdoor cafe and a couple was seated at one of the tables. The gentleman saw me and kept weaving and dodging and hiding his face so I could take a clear shot of him and the woman he was with.

I still wonder if he was with an innamorata and thought I was a private detective hired by his wife!

Just a thought that there may be other reasons why the poor woman didn't want her picture taken!
 
Originally Posted by bmattock
FWIW, I do the same thing when I leave Target or Walmart or CompUSA and the security guards want to see inside my bag or want to examine my register receipt.

I recently asked an attorney friend of mine about this. I had been confronted by a Joe Mannix wannabe at Wally World when one of their perp detectors beeped at the time that I (and several others) were exiting. This kid was not the brightest bulb on the marquee, and it took a while to sink in -- like I walked back and forth thru the Nark-O-Matic without beeping -- for him to realize that the real perp was probably about a mile away by then.

Anyway, this conversation was off the clock and not "legal advice" but he did say that (at least in this state) that the Wally World store security kids do indeed have the authority to detain you and call in the city cops if they have a "reasonable belief" that you have committed a crime. He said that they can't actually make an arrest or do any invasive search, but they can hold you and let the city cops take over.

I asked him if I could take any legal action if I was held and found to be innocent and he said "probably not as long as they were reasonable" and such.

peterc said:
I once managed to turn the search request into a free (well, it wasted 5 minutes of my time) DVD at a Futureshop.
After I went through the checkout the security person, who'd watched the entire transaction, demanded to see my receipt and search my bags. ... So I turned around, went back to the checkout and demanded a full refund. ... I was offered my choice of DVD (up to $40) for my trouble.

I don't know if I will do this, but I feel like doing things like that. Around here, Sams Club checks all receipts as you exit. Best Buy seems to spot check. Burlington Coat Factory seems to do it on a whim. And at Target' the perp detector will beep and nobody will pay any attention to it, same at Home Depot.
 
dmr said:
Around here, Sams Club checks all receipts as you exit. Best Buy seems to spot check. Burlington Coat Factory seems to do it on a whim. And at Target' the perp detector will beep and nobody will pay any attention to it, same at Home Depot.

Costco does much the same as Sam's Club. I imagine at Sam's the purchaser also does their own "bagging" (i.e. desparately shoves items they've bought into whatever boxes are laying around) as is the case at Costco. Such a crazy system does potentially make it easy for someone to put an "unpurchased" item in a box - hence the "eyeball scan" at the door.

I usually find that the folks doing such "scans" are pretty dazed-out. The seem to just count the items on the receipt and see if it is approximately the same as the number of items in the cart!

Not surprised that the perp detector at HD gets ignored. Ever try to fit a 2 x 4 under your sweater? 😀

Now, although we are way OT, I really do think the old lady in the original post was "foolin' around". 😉
 
dmr said:
Anyway, this conversation was off the clock and not "legal advice" but he did say that (at least in this state) that the Wally World store security kids do indeed have the authority to detain you and call in the city cops if they have a "reasonable belief" that you have committed a crime. He said that they can't actually make an arrest or do any invasive search, but they can hold you and let the city cops take over.

Laws differ from state to state, and I'm not a lawyer. But I worked in law enforcement for a number of years, and got pretty good practical training. As I understand it, "arrest" actually means "detain" or "stop." If you stop someone from going where they will, you have arrested them. People tend to think that you're not arrested until the cuffs go on, or until you've been read your Miranda rights. Not true - if you are no longer free to leave, you're arrested.

Anyone has the ability to 'arrest' anyone - in the old Mayberry definition of "citizen's arrest, citizen's arrest!" But a citizen who does so bears a pretty big responsibility. They could find themselves arrested for unlawful detention or other crimes, depending on local laws. They can certainly find their butts sued off. And if they work for a company and do this 'detention' acting as an agent for the company - meaning they perform such actions at the direction of the company, then the company can be held liable in a tort action as well.

What that works out to in practical terms is this - most stores will act as if they are blocking exits - they will act as if they have the authority to demand to see your receipt or look in your bag. They will post signs saying that they have the authority to search any bag a customer brings on the premises. All bluff. You'll note that that they don't actually block your way if you try to leave. They won't "order" you to do something, they'll tell you what THEY need you to do - it's a fine line, most people don't understand the semantical difference. "I need to look in your bag" is not an order. "Open your bag so I can search it" is an order. See the difference?

But most people comply - they think they have to. The stores prefer it that way, they're not going to publicize that they don't actually have the right to demand to look in your bag. People obey authority figures - we've been trained to since birth.

In practice, most store security personnel will not detain someone unless they personally see you hide an item or make another action that would lead a reasonable person to believe that they were going to steal that item. You don't actually have to leave the store to be stopped - in fact, if they are going to stop you, they prefer to do it well before you get to the door.

I asked him if I could take any legal action if I was held and found to be innocent and he said "probably not as long as they were reasonable" and such.

Right. If they say "You need to stay here until the police arrive" and you do, you may not be under arrest (or detention, same thing). If you decide to leave and they prevent you from doing so, then there is no question - you have been arrested. If they then proceed to search you without your permission and find nothing, that may be actionable. However, there is a lot of grey area. If they are prepared to testify that they saw you hide something, but could not find it when they searched you because you had dumped it - it might become subject to the 'reasonable man' test, and call it a push.

I don't know if I will do this, but I feel like doing things like that. Around here, Sams Club checks all receipts as you exit. Best Buy seems to spot check. Burlington Coat Factory seems to do it on a whim. And at Target' the perp detector will beep and nobody will pay any attention to it, same at Home Depot.

I don't advise anyone from doing anything they feel might get them in trouble or cause them undue stress or trouble. But I do not stop or consent to be searched or to have my property searched - ever. And that is everywhere. I used to get a very aggressive response from Fry's Electronics security guys - they would get up and circle around me as I walked out into the parking lot - telling me that I was going to get messed up if I didn't stop, etc. I just kept stepping. They never laid a hand on me, but they always made a big show of writing down my license plate number, pretending to talk on cell phones to the police, and so on. Fun guys. I read online that they got the snot sued out of them for that sort of thing.

There are always lines and grey areas. When you walk into a store, if you are watched and photographed and video'd, you really have no legal right to demand that it stop - if you don't like it you don't have to shop there. However, in general, stores can't stop you from leaving, and they can't search you or your property. If they believe you have stolen something and are willing to bet their butts on that, they can put the habeus grabbus on you and call the police. If you have nothing on you, they may be in trouble - depends on how litigious you are. You might sue and the court decides that their behavior was not outrageous - that's life. But that's why most stores won't go the last mile to stop you - they don't feel like playing that potentially expensive game.

Store security guys usually have to go through a couple of days of nothing but video training and they even get tested on it - at least the major chains are that way. They want to protect their property from being stolen, but they don't want thugs or cop wanna-bees who think they can throw a tackle on someone who refuses to display his receipt.

If you don't feel like taking it to the next level, just try noting the words used, and the body language and movements that security guards use in places like Best Buy or CompUSA. Pretend you don't plan to show your receipt - see if they move to block your way. Say "No thanks" when they ask you - but note what words they use to make the request. If I'm right, they'll always couch it in terms like "I need you to show me your receipt" or "Would you please show me your receipt, sir?" If you comply, you are volunteering - so no harm, no foul. The test comes if you decide NOT to comply. What do they do? In my case, they usually just mutter and move on while I stroll out.

Make no mistake - I don't steal. But I don't prove it to security guards, either. My property is mine the moment I pay for it - I will not consent to be searched, ever.

Best Regards,

Bill Mattocks
 
I would have very politely informed them, that they are in a public place, and as such, they are legally, fair game. For any photographer in the area. And I may have refused to simulate a deleting process. I'm all for privacy etc. But this is going too far. Perhaps if they were very nice, and had "asked" me, instead of "told" me, I may have pretended to delete it... 🙄

Russ
 
Steve B said:
Alternative: Why not have her look through the viewfinder to show that she's not in the frame?

And I STILL think she was "steppin' out with another fella" or something like that.

You have to be sensitive to the fact that sometimes folks are just embarrased when someone they don't know takes a picture of them! For goodness sake, even you are in a "public place" your subject may well like to "preserve" a sense of privacy - even if unwarranted.

This seems like another thread that went "way over the top" over a story of an embarrased woman who was upset that her picture was taken next to some guy.

GEEZ - lighten up!
 
Back
Top Bottom