Hatch
Established
Now now,
Let's not be too close minded.
That's not the path to glory or genius.
Let's not be too close minded.
That's not the path to glory or genius.
Araakii
Well-known
It's a TOY. Would you car drivers laugh at your son playing with a toy car?
stompyq
Well-known
Ouch... This is a new level of tastelessness... Now I'd like to hear what those that hate swirly bokeh have to say about this![]()
better taste than people who shoot HDR's
NeeZee
Well-known
aww, come on - it's kinda cute isn't it?
and i agree with jsrockit - if you think that bokeh is what matters in photography you might as well just use this lens as the pictures are actually just as corny as the usual "bokehlicious" stuff you encounter everywhere on the net.
and i agree with jsrockit - if you think that bokeh is what matters in photography you might as well just use this lens as the pictures are actually just as corny as the usual "bokehlicious" stuff you encounter everywhere on the net.
sepiareverb
genius and moron
I'll wait for a Bokehmorphic ASPH.
vidgamer
Established
Now if someone would make it so you can insert a central gradient at the aperture, then you could have bokeh like the Sony STF. (I suspect it's patented anyway...)
I just find it funny that they make this lens and a $4,000 M mount lens. Something tells me that people will regret buying a $4000 lens from SLR Magic.
umcelinho
Marcelo
I just find it funny that they make this lens and a $4,000 M mount lens. Something tells me that people will regret buying a $4000 lens from SLR Magic.
well put, I thought the same when I saw who did them
Thardy
Veteran
I'd prefer that people didn't concentrate on bokeh as the #1 element in a photo above content, composition, etc. Yes, I'd prefer bokakeh...at least that is funny. However, wouldn't that be more appropriate for a lens that squirts out something one you hit the shutter?
Funny that you mentioned bokeh as the most important element ... this is the same company that is marketing the $4000 50mm T/0.95 lens that people were going crazy over on another gear centric photo forum.
They should maybe sell these toy lenses under a different label.
Araakii
Well-known
I just find it funny that they make this lens and a $4,000 M mount lens. Something tells me that people will regret buying a $4000 lens from SLR Magic.
Haha I am looking forward to this. But Steve Huff will still rate it as the best lens.
I saw that Araakii... but he seems to be in tight with SLR Magic. I'm skeptical. $4,000 gets you a very nice Leica brand lens (not that I'd ever buy a $4000 lens).
farlymac
PF McFarland
I wonder when museums and galleries will start buying/selling photos that have bokeh as its primary subject matter?
vidgamer
Established
They have paintings of solid color, so anything is possible as far as I'm concerned. 
I think bokeh is often important and sometimes interesting in its own right, but no it's not the main criteria of a good photo IMO.
I think bokeh is often important and sometimes interesting in its own right, but no it's not the main criteria of a good photo IMO.
Ronald_H
Don't call me Ron
Would you prefer bokakeh?
This almost brought me to tears...
kanzlr
Hexaneur
This almost brought me to tears...
You should wear protective glasses if you are in the middle.
Sparrow
Veteran
I wonder when museums and will start buying/selling photos that have bokeh as its primary subject matter?
I find it difficult to believe that any gallery or dealer would compromise their morels just to make money ...
Jamie Pillers
Skeptic
This is BOKEH-licious!! Here's hoping they add an aperture shaped like a question mark. One shaped like a hand with the middle finger raised would also undoubtedly be a huger seller. 
One shaped like a hand with the middle finger raised would also undoubtedly be a huger seller.![]()
I may be interested...
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.