Jeremy Z
Well-known
Nice shots dourbalistar. I especially like the cliff face and the shot of your daughter (?) with just the right amount of background blur. We can tell something about the surroundings, but it's blurred enough not to distract.
Nice shots dourbalistar. I especially like the cliff face and the shot of your daughter (?) with just the right amount of background blur. We can tell something about the surroundings, but it's blurred enough not to distract.
Nikon FM2n, AI Nikkor 50mm f/1.8S, Ultrafine Xtreme 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.
2019.10.21 Roll #228-04199-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
dourbalistar: Amazing photo! Would you mind sharing details of how you made this exposure!
All your work in this thread is brilliant. Nice looking family!
I do not need a new lens, I do not need a new..., I do not need...😀
...but now I'm curious and I would like to try one on my FM2T !!!
Excellent photos in the thread...
I have shot with various versions of the 50mm 1.8 such as the Ai, Ai-S, E Series, and this Ai-S pancake version you speak of - I realize that they aren't all identical and have slight variations, but I couldn't personally tell you how they differ.
My hands aren't massive, but I find the pancake version to be just a bit too small to be comfortable for me. I've settled on the 50mm f/2 as my primary F mount 50, but if I had to pick one of the 1.8's, it would be the plain jane Ai version.
Was considering a pancake lens for my FM2 but the price differential for the ‘S’ version doesn’t seem meaningful enough though nice to have 0.45m close focus. The images appear lower contrast, probably typical for the era. The 45/2.8 AIP, though a stop slower, is truly a pancake. Personally, the slightly wider CV 2/40 has a closer focus of 0.4m and is a higher contrast optic too. Tried the SLI version and it’s every bit as solidly built as any Nikkor AIS.
The 45 pancake is *definitely* overpriced for its performance, which is good for a Tessar, not that that says very much. it’s more of a collector lens and still sells for $300ish, plus or minus. The earlier 45 GN is truly a low contrast Tessar.
The Voigtlander is the best of this comparison (as expected as it’s a contemporary design and manufacture) but also sells for quite a bit more. I prefer the larger 40/2 SL IIS that focuses to 0.25 without a close-up filter; great lens!
Agreed. An SLR lens that doesn’t have decent close focus won’t qualify to be in my bag. 🙂